Co-creation of a patient engagement strategy in cancer research funding

被引:3
|
作者
Taccone M.S. [1 ]
Baudais N. [2 ]
Wood D. [2 ]
Bays S. [2 ]
Frost S. [2 ]
Urquhart R. [3 ]
Graham I.D. [4 ,5 ]
Takacs J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Childhood Cancer Survivor Canada, Toronto, ON
[2] Canadian Cancer Society, 55 St Clair Ave W Suite 500, Toronto, M4V 2Y7, ON
[3] Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
[4] Schools of Epidemiology and Public Health & Nursing, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, K1G 5Z3, ON
[5] Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 241, Ottawa, K1H 8L6, ON
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Co-creation; Patient engagement; Research funding; Strategy development;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-023-00501-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: As research teams, networks, and institutes, and health, medical, and scientific communities begin to build consensus on the benefits of patient engagement in cancer research, research funders are increasingly looking to meaningfully incorporate patient partnership within funding processes and research requirements. The Canadian Cancer Society (CCS), the largest non-profit cancer research funder in Canada, set out to co-create a patient engagement in cancer research strategy with patients, survivors, caregivers and researchers. The goal of this strategy was to meaningfully and systematically engage with patients in research funding and research activities. Methods: A team of four patient partners with diverse cancer and personal experiences, and two researchers at different career stages agreed to participate as members of the strategy team. Ten staff members participated in supportive roles and to give context regarding different departments of CCS. The strategy was co-developed in 2021/2022 over a series of 7 workshops using facilitation strategies such as ground rules and consensus building, and methods such as Design Thinking. The strategy was subjected to 3 rounds of validation. Results: The co-creation and validation process resulted in a multi-faceted strategy with actionable sections, including vision, guiding principles, engagement methods, 13 prioritized engagement activities spanning the spectrum of research funding, and an evaluation framework. The experience of co-creating the strategy was captured using the Patient and Public Engagement Evaluation Tool and revealed a positive, supportive experience. Conclusions: Lessons learned included the value of an emphasis on a co-creation process from day one, the utility of facilitation techniques such as ground rules for dialogue, consensus building and Design Thinking, and the importance (and challenge) of designing for and incorporating equity when drafting the strategy. Future work will include implementation and evaluation of the strategy, as well as an examination of further ways to meaningfully and systematically engage diverse voices in research and research funding. © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Epic Game of Creating a Successful Gamified Co-Creation Strategy
    Lopes, Joao M.
    Gomes, Sofia
    Santos, Nelia
    Cussina, Hugo
    Vieira, Isabel
    Escudeiro, Maria
    Maio, Lissandra
    Magalhaes, Yolanda
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [22] Brand Strategy Co-Creation in a Nonprofit Context: A Strategy-as-Practice Approach
    Vallaster, Christine
    von Wallpach, Sylvia
    NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2018, 47 (05) : 984 - 1006
  • [23] The Co-creation Canvas
    Garmann-Johnsen, Niels F.
    Olsen, Dag H.
    Eikebrokk, Tom R.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS / INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT / INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES 2020 (CENTERIS/PROJMAN/HCIST 2020), 2021, 181 : 189 - 197
  • [24] CO-CREATION IN ORGANISATIONS
    Cheriet, Nabil
    Ahnyne, Redouane
    Saad, Ghizlane
    4TH INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY AND GLOBALIZATION STUDIES (MIRDEC), 2017, : 109 - 115
  • [25] Ecosystems of Co-Creation
    Eckhardt, Jennifer
    Kaletka, Christoph
    Krueger, Daniel
    Maldonado-Mariscal, Karina
    Schulz, Ann Christin
    FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY, 2021, 6
  • [26] The meanings of co-creation
    Ind, Nicholas
    Coates, Nick
    EUROPEAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2013, 25 (01) : 86 - 95
  • [27] CHAOS: A Co-Creation
    Waldron, Hannah
    Braund, Steve
    JOURNAL OF ILLUSTRATION, 2020, 7 (1-2) : 205 - 223
  • [28] Continuous co-creation: how ongoing involvement impacts outcomes of co-creation
    Bentzen, Tina ollgaard
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2022, 24 (01) : 34 - 54
  • [29] Enriching the Existing Knowledge About Co-creation: Identifying Dimensions of Co-creation Using Explicit Theory in Various Research Fields
    Messiha, Katrina
    Altenburg, Teatske M.
    Gine-Garriga, Maria
    Chastin, Sebastien
    Chinapaw, Mai J. M.
    MINERVA, 2025,
  • [30] Patient public involvement (PPI) in health literacy research: Engagement of adults with literacy needs in the co-creation of a hospital-based health literacy plan
    McKenna, Verna B.
    Sixsmith, Jane
    Byrne, Niki
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2023, 26 (03) : 1213 - 1220