Co-creation of a patient engagement strategy in cancer research funding

被引:3
|
作者
Taccone M.S. [1 ]
Baudais N. [2 ]
Wood D. [2 ]
Bays S. [2 ]
Frost S. [2 ]
Urquhart R. [3 ]
Graham I.D. [4 ,5 ]
Takacs J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Childhood Cancer Survivor Canada, Toronto, ON
[2] Canadian Cancer Society, 55 St Clair Ave W Suite 500, Toronto, M4V 2Y7, ON
[3] Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
[4] Schools of Epidemiology and Public Health & Nursing, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, K1G 5Z3, ON
[5] Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 241, Ottawa, K1H 8L6, ON
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Co-creation; Patient engagement; Research funding; Strategy development;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-023-00501-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: As research teams, networks, and institutes, and health, medical, and scientific communities begin to build consensus on the benefits of patient engagement in cancer research, research funders are increasingly looking to meaningfully incorporate patient partnership within funding processes and research requirements. The Canadian Cancer Society (CCS), the largest non-profit cancer research funder in Canada, set out to co-create a patient engagement in cancer research strategy with patients, survivors, caregivers and researchers. The goal of this strategy was to meaningfully and systematically engage with patients in research funding and research activities. Methods: A team of four patient partners with diverse cancer and personal experiences, and two researchers at different career stages agreed to participate as members of the strategy team. Ten staff members participated in supportive roles and to give context regarding different departments of CCS. The strategy was co-developed in 2021/2022 over a series of 7 workshops using facilitation strategies such as ground rules and consensus building, and methods such as Design Thinking. The strategy was subjected to 3 rounds of validation. Results: The co-creation and validation process resulted in a multi-faceted strategy with actionable sections, including vision, guiding principles, engagement methods, 13 prioritized engagement activities spanning the spectrum of research funding, and an evaluation framework. The experience of co-creating the strategy was captured using the Patient and Public Engagement Evaluation Tool and revealed a positive, supportive experience. Conclusions: Lessons learned included the value of an emphasis on a co-creation process from day one, the utility of facilitation techniques such as ground rules for dialogue, consensus building and Design Thinking, and the importance (and challenge) of designing for and incorporating equity when drafting the strategy. Future work will include implementation and evaluation of the strategy, as well as an examination of further ways to meaningfully and systematically engage diverse voices in research and research funding. © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Co-creation and community engagement in implementation research with vulnerable populations: a co-creation process in China
    Zhang, Liyuan
    Li, Katherine T.
    Wang, Tong
    Luo, Danyang
    Tan, Rayner K. J.
    Marley, Gifty
    Tang, Weiming
    Ramaswamy, Rohit
    Tucker, Joseph D.
    Wu, Dan
    SEXUAL HEALTH, 2024, 21 (06)
  • [2] Co-creation of a qualitative fertility research study to understand waiting time experiences through patient engagement
    Madison Healey
    Julia Craig
    Sarah Thomas
    Jillian Tizzard
    Kelsey Puddister
    Erin L McGowan
    Laurie K Twells
    Katie P Wadden
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 10 (1)
  • [3] Engaging families, enhancing research: optimizing rehabilitation research through co-creation of a Family Engagement in Research Framework
    Provvidenza, Christine F.
    Tanel, Nadia
    Ho, Clara
    Jorisch, Suzanne
    Comito, Manuela
    Mcpherson, Amy
    Chau, Tom
    Hickling, Andrea
    Mallory, Kylie D.
    Scratch, Shannon E.
    Research Family Engagement Committee
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2025,
  • [4] Co-creation as a strategy for program management
    Nasholm, Malin H.
    Blomquist, Tomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2015, 8 (01) : 58 - 73
  • [5] Value Co-Creation through Patient Engagement in Health Care: A micro-level approach and research agenda
    Hardyman, Wendy
    Daunt, Kate L.
    Kitchener, Martin
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 17 (01) : 90 - 107
  • [6] Museum exhibition co-creation in the age of data: Emerging design strategy for enhanced visitor engagement
    Derda, Izabela
    CONVERGENCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH INTO NEW MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 30 (05): : 1596 - 1609
  • [7] When co-creation pays: stimulating engagement to increase revenues
    Tu, YaoJen
    Neuhofer, Barbara
    Viglia, Giampaolo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 30 (04) : 2093 - 2111
  • [8] Using Community Engagement to Drive Co-Creation in Rural China
    Wang, Wei
    Bryan-Kinns, Nick
    Ji, Tie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DESIGN, 2016, 10 (01): : 37 - 52
  • [9] An ecosystem perspective synthesis of co-creation research
    Ranjan, Kumar Rakesh
    Read, Stuart
    INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2021, 99 : 79 - 96
  • [10] Agenda for Co-Creation Tourism Experience Research
    Binkhorst, Esther
    Den Dekker, Teun
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MARKETING & MANAGEMENT, 2009, 18 (2-3) : 311 - 327