IDGL, an interaction design framework based on systematic innovation and quality function deployment

被引：5

作者：

Filippi S. ^{[1
]}

Barattin D. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] PIRG-Product Innovation Research Group, DIEGM Department, University of Udine, Via delle Scienze, 206, Udine

来源：

International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing | 2016年 / 10卷 / 02期

关键词：

Interaction design; Product innovation; QFD; TRIZ;

D O I：

10.1007/s12008-014-0231-6

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Concerns about human-machine interaction are becoming one of the most important thrusts for the development of innovative and successful products. Interaction design methods and tools are already described in literature and available for designers, and the analysis of their characteristics suggests the synergy with other research fields aimed at developing an interaction design framework as complete as possible. The complementary aspects of the inventive problem solving theory named TRIZ were considered, and the linking was done thanks to the structured approach to information gathering of the house of quality, one of the data structures in the quality function deployment (QFD) design method. The result is the interaction design guidelines (IDGL), a framework implemented in a Microsoft access database that supports designers starting from collecting users’ needs up to the generation of design solutions. This paper describes the IDGL development, together with a first adoption in the field and a validation of the process and results. © 2014, Springer-Verlag France.

引用

页码：119 / 137

页数：18

共 59 条

[11]

Navarre D., Palanque P., Ladry J.F., Barboni E., ICOs: a model-based user interface description technique dedicated to interactive systems addressing usability, reliability and scalability. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 16(4), Art, 18, pp. 1-56, (2009)

[12]

Nielsen J., Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation, Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Monterey, pp. 373-380, (1992)

[13]

Howarth J., Smith-Jackson T., Hartson R., Supporting novice usability practitioners with usability engineering tools, Hum. Comput. Stud., 67, pp. 533-549, (2009)

[14]

Montabert C., McCrickard D., Winchester W.W., An integrative approach to requirements analysis: how task models support requirements reuse in a user-centric design framework, Interact. Comput., 21, pp. 304-315, (2009)

[15]

Andre T.S., Hartson H.R., Belz S.M., McCreaty F.A., The user action framework: a reliable foundation for usability engineering support tools, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud, 54, 1, pp. 107-136, (2001)

[16]

Norman D.A., Cognitive Engineering. User Centered System Design, (1986)

[17]

Wever R., Boks C., Van Kuijk J.I., User-centred design for sustainable behavior, Int. J. Sustain. Eng., 1, pp. 9-20, (2008)

[18]

Lilley D., Bhamra T., Lofthouse V., Towards sustainable use: an exploration of designing for behavioural change, Proceeding of the DeSForM2006: design and semantics of form and movement, pp. 84-97, (2006)

[19]

Tang T., Bhamra T., Understanding consumer behavior to reduce environmental impacts through sustainable product design, Proceeding of the Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference, Sheffield Hallam University, (2008)

[20]

Oviatt S., Cohen A., Miller A., Hodge K., Mann A., The impact of interface affordances on human ideation, problem solving, and inferential reasoning. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 19(3), Art, 22, pp. 1-30, (2012)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →