Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cirrhosis

被引:32
作者
Nicolas M. Intagliata
Hillary Maitland
Stephen H. Caldwell
机构
[1] University of Virginia Medical Center,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Coagulation in Liver Disease
[2] University of Virginia Medical Center,Division of Hematology
关键词
Direct oral anticoagulants; Thrombosis; Portal vein; Bleeding; Heparin; Warfarin; Thrombin; Factor Xa;
D O I
10.1007/s11938-016-0092-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The risk of thrombosis in patients with chronic liver disease is increasingly recognized. As patients with cirrhosis develop indications for anticoagulation therapy (e.g., venous thromboembolism, portal vein thrombosis, or atrial fibrillation), providers are left to make difficult decisions when selecting therapeutics with little evidence to rely on. Current practice supports the use of low molecular weight heparin or vitamin K antagonists in select patients with cirrhosis requiring anticoagulation. While traditional anticoagulants may be safe and effective in select patients with compensated cirrhosis, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is more controversial. DOAC are desirable as they do not require routine monitoring and can be taken orally. Unfortunately, patients with chronic liver disease were excluded from clinical trials that demonstrated efficacy and safety when compared to traditional anticoagulation. Data are now emerging that support the use of DOAC in well-compensated cirrhosis patients. However, further study is needed with all (traditional and DOAC) anticoagulation medications in patients with cirrhosis to better ensure safety and further understand pharmacologic properties in this challenging population.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 256
页数:9
相关论文
共 214 条
[1]  
Prins MH(2015)Patient-reported treatment satisfaction with oral rivaroxaban versus standard therapy in the treatment of pulmonary embolism; results from the EINSTEIN PE trial Thromb Res 135 281-8
[2]  
Bamber L(2015)Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension J Hepatol 63 743-52
[3]  
Cano SJ(2014)Prophylactic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized cirrhosis patients is not associated with high rates of gastrointestinal bleeding Liver Int 34 26-32
[4]  
Wang MY(2015)Safety and efficacy of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized patients with cirrhosis: a single-center retrospective cohort study J Thromb Haemost 13 1245-53
[5]  
Erkens P(2011)Low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with advanced cirrhosis Liver Int 31 75-82
[6]  
Bauersachs R(2010)Safety and efficacy of anticoagulation therapy with low molecular weight heparin for portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis J Clin Gastroenterol 44 448-51
[7]  
de Franchis R(2015)Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation therapy with different doses of enoxaparin for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients with hepatitis B Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27 914-9
[8]  
Baveno VIF(2012)Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation on patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10 776-83
[9]  
Intagliata NM(2012)Prospective evaluation of anticoagulation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for the management of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis Liver Int 32 919-27
[10]  
Henry ZH(2015)Idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal N Engl J Med 373 511-20