A critical overview of transboundary aquifers shared by South Africa

被引:0
作者
J. E. Cobbing
P. J. Hobbs
R. Meyer
J. Davies
机构
[1] Water Geosciences Consulting,
[2] Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR),undefined
[3] British Geological Survey (BGS),undefined
来源
Hydrogeology Journal | 2008年 / 16卷
关键词
Transboundary aquifer; Africa; South Africa; Groundwater management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transboundary groundwater commonly implies a body of groundwater intersected by a political border with the attendant potential threat of dispute over a shared resource. This definition is inadequate in many parts of southern Africa. Approximately 96% of South Africa’s borders are underlain by low-yielding aquifers and, coupled with a low demand for water attendant on low population density, the risk of over-pumping or pollution leading to dispute is low, and a modified understanding is required. Examples of transboundary aquifers are used to illustrate implications for policy and management of southern African transboundary groundwater resources, where transmissivities are low and, less commonly, where over-pumping may indeed be a problem. The general lack of technical cooperation, data sharing, training and research between the riparian states on hydrogeology hampers a mutual understanding of the resources. The concept of transboundary groundwater must necessarily include aquifers where little cross-border flow occurs, but where cross-border cooperation will help to ensure sustainable cooperative utilisation of shared aquifer resources. This is imperative if future disputes are to be averted. Agreement between scientists is a necessary precursor to broader transnational governance agreements in regard to shared water resources, and recent initiatives by the Orange-Senqu River Commission promise closer integration.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1214
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[42]   Positive practice environments in critical care units in South Africa [J].
Pretorius, R. ;
Klopper, H. C. .
INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2012, 59 (01) :66-72
[43]   Critical Regulatory Characteristics for Sustainable Building Construction in South Africa [J].
Emere, Chijioke Emmanuel ;
Aigbavboa, Clinton Ohis ;
Oguntona, Olusegun Aanuoluwapo .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (05)
[44]   Moving from crisis to critical praxis: Geography in South Africa [J].
Daya, Shari .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS, 2022, 47 (01) :9-15
[45]   Critical and interpretive accounting, auditing and governance research in South Africa [J].
Maroun, W. ;
Jonker, C. .
SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND AUDITING RESEARCH-SAJAAR, 2014, 16 (01) :51-62
[46]   Curriculum Decolonization and Internationalization: A Critical Perspective from South Africa [J].
Heleta, Savo ;
Chasi, Samia .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS, 2024, 14 (02) :75-90
[47]   The education and professional practice of valuers in South Africa: a critical review [J].
Mooya, Manya Mainza .
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (03) :245-+
[48]   Shared experiences, shared support: A qualitative study on the importance of relatability in interpersonal relationships for youth mental health in South Africa [J].
Henry, Junita ;
Azariah, Fredric ;
Hughsam, Matt ;
Skeen, Sarah ;
Tomlinson, Mark ;
Busakhwe, Chuma ;
Mokoena, Khotso ;
Mudaly, Almaaz ;
Sinha, Moitreyee ;
Laurenzi, Christina .
CAMBRIDGE PRISMS-GLOBAL MENTAL HEALTH, 2024, 11
[49]   Biofuel Investments in Africa: Lessons for South Africa [J].
Schultz, Cecilia ;
van Riet, Gideon .
SOUTH AFRICAN REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2018, 49 (01) :34-52
[50]   Evaluation of geologic and geomorphologic influences on borehole productivity in crystalline bedrock aquifers of Limpopo Province, South Africa [J].
Holland, Martin ;
Witthueser, Kai T. .
HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 19 (05) :1065-1083