A novel hybrid MCDM approach to evaluate universities based on student perspective

被引:0
作者
Ertugrul Ayyildiz
Mirac Murat
Gul Imamoglu
Yildiz Kose
机构
[1] Karadeniz Technical University,Department of Industrial Engineering
[2] İstanbul Technical University,Department of Industrial Engineering
来源
Scientometrics | 2023年 / 128卷
关键词
University ranking problem; Neutrosophic numbers; AHP; VIKOR; Higher education; Turkey;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
University rankings are an essential source of comparisons between universities according to specific combinations of criteria. International or national rankings have an increasing impact on higher education institutions, stakeholders, and their environments. Thereby, on behalf of effective decision-making, university-ranking efforts should be a process involving some conflicting criteria and uncertainties in a more sensitive manner. This study presents a detailed university evaluation procedure under certain service criteria via multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodologies and provides an appropriate clustering of universities according to teaching and research factors. A hierarchical cluster-based Interval Valued Neutrosophic Analytic Hierarchy Process (IVN-AHP) integrated VIKOR methodology that includes two stages, clustering and ranking, is proposed for the university evaluation problem. The hierarchical clustering method is performed using teaching and research factors in the first stage. The second stage addresses the determination weights of service criteria through IVN-AHP and the ranking of universities by using VIKOR according to service criteria under determined clusters. This study, in which the proposed methodology is applied to Turkish universities, is the most comprehensive in terms of the number of universities evaluated and participating students. Furthermore, the integration of IVN-AHP and VIKOR to solve MCDM problems is presented for the first time. This study differs from other studies in terms of novelties both methodological-based and application based. Moreover, categorizing universities with similar characteristics into groups using cluster analysis and ranking them with the MCDM methodology provide a more realistic and effective interpretation of the results.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 86
页数:31
相关论文
共 160 条
[1]  
Abbott M(2003)The efficiency of Australian universities: A data envelopment analysis Economics of Education Review 22 89-97
[2]  
Doucouliagos C(2019)A hybrid neutrosophic multiple criteria group decision making approach for project selection Cognitive Systems Research 57 216-227
[3]  
Abdel-Basset M(2003)Performance measures for academic departments International Journal of Educational Management 17 330-338
[4]  
Atef A(2014)URAP-TR: A national ranking for Turkish universities based on academic performance Scientometrics 101 159-178
[5]  
Smarandache F(2020)Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based multi-criteria decision making for universities ranking Symmetry 12 1351-36120
[6]  
Al-Turki U(2020)Identifying sustainability drivers in higher education through fuzzy AHP Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning. 27 36109-16163
[7]  
Duffuaa S(2020)A novel spherical fuzzy AHP-integrated spherical WASPAS methodology for petrol station location selection problem: A real case study for İstanbul Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24 16149-5411
[8]  
Alaşehir O(2020)Individual credit ranking by an integrated interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy Electre methodology Soft Computing 2 5408-405
[9]  
Çakır MP(2010)Qualitative Indicators for the evaluation of universities performance Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 16 393-319
[10]  
Acartürk C(1987)Performance indicators in higher education Higher Education 33 302-52