ADHD and EEG-neurofeedback: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled feasibility study

被引:0
作者
M. M. Lansbergen
M. van Dongen-Boomsma
J. K. Buitelaar
D. Slaats-Willemse
机构
[1] Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre,Department of Psychiatry, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour
[2] Karakter University Centre for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour
[3] Radboud University Nijmegen,undefined
来源
Journal of Neural Transmission | 2011年 / 118卷
关键词
EEG-neurofeedback; Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); Randomized controlled trial (RCT); Electroencephalogram (EEG); Safety; Feasibility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Electroencephalography (EEG)-neurofeedback has been shown to offer therapeutic benefits to patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in several, mostly uncontrolled studies. This pilot study is designed to test the feasibility and safety of using a double-blind placebo feedback-controlled design and to explore the initial efficacy of individualized EEG-neurofeedback training in children with ADHD. Fourteen children (8–15 years) with ADHD defined according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria were randomly allocated to 30 sessions of EEG-neurofeedback (n = 8) or placebo feedback (n = 6). Safety measures (adverse events and sleep problems), ADHD symptoms and global improvement were monitored. With respect to feasibility, all children completed the study and attended all study visits and training sessions. No significant adverse effects or sleep problems were reported. Regarding the expectancy, 75% of children and their parent(s) in the active neurofeedback group and 50% of children and their parent(s) in the placebo feedback group thought they received placebo feedback training. Analyses revealed significant improvements of ADHD symptoms over time, but changes were similar for both groups. This pilot study shows that it is feasible to conduct a rigorous placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of neurofeedback training in children with ADHD. However, a double-blind design may not be feasible since using automatic adjusted reward thresholds may not work as effective as manually adjusted reward thresholds. Additionally, implementation of active learning strategies may be an important factor for the efficacy of EEG-neurofeedback training. Based on the results of this pilot study, changes are made in the design of the ongoing study.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 284
页数:9
相关论文
共 187 条
  • [1] Angelakis E(2007)EEG neurofeedback: a brief overview and an example of peak alpha frequency training for cognitive enhancement in the elderly Clin Neuropsychol 21 110-129
  • [2] Stathopoulou S(2007)Is attention deficit hyperactivity disorder a valid diagnosis in the presence of high IQ? Results from the MGH longitudinal family studies of ADHD J Child Psychol Psychiatry 48 687-694
  • [3] Frymiare JL(2008)EEG phenotypes predict treatment outcome to stimulants in children with ADHD J Integr Neurosci 7 421-438
  • [4] Green DL(2009)Efficacy of neurofeedback treatment in ADHD: the effects on inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity: a meta-analysis Clin EEG Neurosci 40 180-189
  • [5] Lubar JF(2008)Atomoxetine for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder Pediatrics 121 e314-e320
  • [6] Kounios J(2003)A review of electrophysiology in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: I. Qualitative and quantitative electroencephalography Clin Neurophysiol 114 171-183
  • [7] Antshel KM(1999)Autism screening questionnaire: diagnostic validity Br J Psychiatry 175 444-451
  • [8] Faraone SV(2004)Stimulant treatment over five years: adherence, effectiveness, and adverse effects J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 43 559-567
  • [9] Stallone K(2006)Stimulant treatment over 5 years: effects on growth J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 45 415-421
  • [10] Nave A(2001)Excess beta activity in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: an atypical electrophysiological group Psychiatry Res 103 205-218