Couple Relationship Education Outcomes Predicted by Family Life Stage and Traditionality

被引:0
作者
J. Scott Crapo
Kay Bradford
Tyson S. Barrett
Jacqueline A. Miller
Brian J. Higginbotham
机构
[1] Utah State University,Department of Human Development and Family Studies
[2] Utah State University,Department of Psychology
[3] University of New Mexico,Department of Geospatial and Population Studies
来源
Contemporary Family Therapy | 2020年 / 42卷
关键词
Couple relationship education (CRE); Family development; Family life education; Family life stage; Mixed effects models; Relationship interventions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An understudied aspect of couple relationship education (CRE) effectiveness is participant factors, including their changing needs over time. This study investigated the influence of changing needs over time on CRE outcomes. Participants (n = 692) self-selected to a CRE course and completed pre- and posttests. Family life stages were utilized to reflect changing needs, and participants were also assessed whether they fit family development theory’s expected (traditional) stage progression. Using linear mixed-effects models, we estimated the impact of family life stage on the posttest scores of three outcomes: commitment, relationship knowledge, and control rejection. We further tested whether a traditional progression interacted with family life stage. Related to our first hypothesis, if CRE outcomes differed by life stage, results indicated that the CRE outcome of commitment was different for those in the establishment and transition to parenthood stages, and the CRE outcome of knowledge differed for those in the transition to parenthood and preschool stages. The second hypothesis, an interaction between life stage and traditional (versus nontraditional) form of that stage, was supported for commitment and knowledge. Those who were in non-traditional earlier life stages and scored low on the pretest did not do as well on the posttest as their traditional counterparts. It may be that what couples need varies based on life stage and traditionality, and typical CRE courses may be less effective for non-traditional participants. Curricula should be carefully considered, to ensure it applies to the targeted participants. Theoretical implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 435
页数:13
相关论文
共 132 条
[1]  
Ahituv A(2011)Job stability, earnings, marital stability: How are they related? Review of Economics of the Household 9 221-249
[2]  
Lerman R(2012)I hope: A phenomenological study of the lived experiences of fragile families Marriage & Family Review 48 621-642
[3]  
Allen K(2014)Work–family conflict among members of full-time dual-earner couples: An examination of family life stage, gender, and age Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 19 376-384
[4]  
Allen TD(2010)Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments Journal of Marriage and Family 72 650-666
[5]  
Finkelstein LM(2014)Does social and economic disadvantage moderate the effects of relationship education on unwed couples? An analysis of data from the 15-month Building Strong Families evaluation Family Relations 63 343-355
[6]  
Amato PR(2011)Multiple imputation by chained equations: What is it and how does it work? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 20 40-49
[7]  
Amato PR(2017)Understanding the proclivity of visiting friends and relatives (VFR) travel across family life cycle stages in Australia International Journal of Tourism Research 19 447-454
[8]  
Azur MJ(2015)Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 Journal of Statistical Software 67 1-48
[9]  
Stuart EA(2016)Dyadic examination of the influence of family relationships on life satisfaction at the empty-nest stage Journal of Adult Development 23 174-182
[10]  
Frangakis C(2017)It’s about time! Examining received dosage and program duration as predictors of change among non-distressed and distressed married couple and relationship education participants Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 43 391-409