Recent applications of the precautionary principle in the jurisprudence of the CJEU – a new yardstick in EU environmental decision making?

被引:0
作者
Sobotta C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Court of Justice of the European Union, Luxembourg
关键词
End of waste; Environment; Hazardous waste; Precautionary principle; Species protection;
D O I
10.1007/s12027-020-00628-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent judgments on species protection and waste, the Court of Justice has taken up a very restrictive concept to specify the precautionary principle, which – in this form – it had so far only applied to site protection under the Habitats Directive. According to this concept, certain activities can only be permitted if there is no reasonable scientific doubt that they will not cause harm. This paper will present the respective decisions and then discuss their practical consequences, the context of complex assessments, proportionality and the possible transfer of this line of jurisprudence to other provisions on permits. © 2020, @ ERA.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 735
页数:12
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Boitani L., Phillips M., Jhala Y., Canis lupus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, (2018)
  • [2] Kock W., Der Schutz des Wolfes und die Möglichkeiten der Entnahme in Deutschland, Nat. Recht, 40, 12, pp. 812-818, (2018)
  • [3] Nebelsieck R., Wolfsabschuss in Niedersachsen, Nat. Recht, 41, 4, pp. 253-257, (2019)
  • [4] Opdam P., Broekmeyer M., Kistenkas F., Identifying uncertainties in judging the significance of human impacts on Natura 2000 sites, Environ. Sci. Policy, 12, 7, pp. 912-921, (2009)
  • [5] Sobotta C., Species protection in the environmental assessment—assembling the puzzle, J. Eur. Environ. Plan. Law, 10, 3, pp. 233-249, (2013)
  • [6] Sobotta C., The European Union legal boundaries for semi-natural habitats management in Natura 2000 sites, J. Nat. Conserv., 43, pp. 261-267, (2018)
  • [7] Sobotta C., How the Court of Justice of the European Union deals with scientific knowledge and what this means for Member State court, Practice, (2020)