Primary spinal cord glioma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database study

被引:0
作者
Michael T. Milano
Mahlon D. Johnson
Joohee Sul
Nimish A. Mohile
David N. Korones
Paul Okunieff
Kevin A. Walter
机构
[1] University of Rochester Medical Center,Department of Radiation Oncology
[2] University of Rochester Medical Center,Department of Pathology
[3] University of Rochester Medical Center,Department of Neurology
[4] University of Rochester Medical Center,Department of Pediatrics
[5] University of Rochester Medical Center,Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology
[6] University of Rochester Medical Center,Department of Neurosurgery
来源
Journal of Neuro-Oncology | 2010年 / 98卷
关键词
Spinal cord ependymoma; Spinal cord astrocytoma; Spinal cord glioma; Radiotherapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To characterize the overall survival (OS) and cause specific survival (CSS), and variables affecting outcome, in patients with primary spinal cord astrocytoma (SCA) and ependymoma (SCE). About 664 patients with SCA and 1,057 patients with SCE were analyzed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. For grade 1, 2, 3 and 4 SCA, the 5-year OS was 82, 70, 28 and 14%; the 5-year CSS was 89, 77, 36 and 20%. For SCA, lower grade, younger age, and undergoing resection significantly improved OS and CSS; treatment without radiotherapy was favorable for CSS. Smaller tumor size also improved survival. For grade 1, 2, and 3 SCE, the 5-year OS was 92, 97 and 58%; the 5-year CSS was 100, 98 and 64%. For SCE, lower grade, younger age, and undergoing resection significantly improved OS and CSS; treatment without radiotherapy was favorable for OS. Smaller tumor size did not confer a survival benefit. Patients with resected grade 2 spinal cord glioma who did not receive radiotherapy fared well with respect to OS and CSS. For patients with spinal cord glioma, the variables of histology, grade, age and undergoing resection are significant predictors of outcome. Though treatment with radiotherapy was associated with worse outcomes, this may reflect a bias in that patients who underwent radiotherapy were perhaps more likely to have had adverse risk factors. Given the retrospective nature of this study, specific recommendations about which situations warrant radiotherapy cannot be determined.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 92
页数:9
相关论文
共 178 条
[1]  
Schellinger KA(2008)Descriptive epidemiology of primary spinal cord tumors J Neurooncol 87 173-179
[2]  
Propp JM(1980)Management of intramedullary spinal cord tumors Radiology 135 473-479
[3]  
Villano JL(1982)Intramedullary spinal cord astrocytoma versus glioblastoma: the prognostic importance of histologic grade Cancer 50 732-735
[4]  
McCarthy BJ(1982)A comparative study of ependymomas by site of origin Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 8 37-43
[5]  
Kopelson G(1983)Ependymomas of the spinal cord Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 9 1093-1096
[6]  
Linggood RM(1983)Ependymomas: results of radiation treatment Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 9 1121-1124
[7]  
Kleinman GM(1984)The treatment of ependymoma of the brain or spinal canal by radiotherapy: a report of 79 cases Clin Radiol 35 163-166
[8]  
Doucette J(1985)Primary spinal cord tumors treated with surgery and postoperative irradiation Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11 1933-1939
[9]  
Wang CC(1985)Myxopapillary ependymoma. A clinicopathologic and immunocytochemical study of 77 cases Cancer 56 883-893
[10]  
Kopelson G(1986)Radiotherapeutic management of adult intraspinal ependymomas Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 12 323-327