The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 epidemic growth in the 37 OECD member states

被引:0
作者
Francisco Pozo-Martin
Heide Weishaar
Florin Cristea
Johanna Hanefeld
Thurid Bahr
Lars Schaade
Charbel El Bcheraoui
机构
[1] Robert Koch Institute,Evidence
[2] Robert Koch Institute,Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection
[3] Robert Koch Institute,Centre for International Health Protection
来源
European Journal of Epidemiology | 2021年 / 36卷
关键词
COVID-19; OECD; Non-pharmaceutical interventions; Longitudinal analysis; Linear mixed models; Generalized linear mixed models;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We estimated the impact of a comprehensive set of non-pharmeceutical interventions on the COVID-19 epidemic growth rate across the 37 member states of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and between October and December 2020. For this task, we conducted a data-driven, longitudinal analysis using a multilevel modelling approach with both maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation. We found that during the early phase of the epidemic: implementing restrictions on gatherings of more than 100 people, between 11 and 100 people, and 10 people or less was associated with a respective average reduction of 2.58%, 2.78% and 2.81% in the daily growth rate in weekly confirmed cases; requiring closing for some sectors or for all but essential workplaces with an average reduction of 1.51% and 1.78%; requiring closing of some school levels or all school levels with an average reduction of 1.12% or 1.65%; recommending mask wearing with an average reduction of 0.45%, requiring mask wearing country-wide in specific public spaces or in specific geographical areas within the country with an average reduction of 0.44%, requiring mask-wearing country-wide in all public places or all public places where social distancing is not possible with an average reduction of 0.96%; and number of tests per thousand population with an average reduction of 0.02% per unit increase. Between October and December 2020 work closing requirements and testing policy were significant predictors of the epidemic growth rate. These findings provide evidence to support policy decision-making regarding which NPIs to implement to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 640
页数:11
相关论文
共 135 条
  • [1] Lyu W(2020)Shelter-in-place orders reduced COVID-19 mortality and reduced the rate of growth in hospitalizations Health Aff 39 1615-1623
  • [2] Wehby GL(2020)The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic Nature 584 262-267
  • [3] Hsiang S(2020)Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions Nat Hum Behav 368 m1141-2411
  • [4] Allen D(2020)Mobility network models of COVID-19 explain inequities and inform reopening Nature 10 020505-48
  • [5] Annan-Phan S(2020)Covid-19: control measures must be equitable and inclusive BMJ 21 522-392
  • [6] Bell K(2020)Early psychological impact of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and lockdown in a large Spanish sample J Glob Health 10 e039334-400
  • [7] Bolliger I(2020)COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures impact on mental health among the general population in italy Front Psychiatry 103 2400-202
  • [8] Chong T(2021)Identifying targets for interventions to support public adherence to government instructions to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 BMC Public Health 67 1-e71
  • [9] Haug N(2020)Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a UK-based focus group study BMJ Open 71 319-253
  • [10] Geyrhofer L(2020)Association of country-wide coronavirus mortality with demographics, testing, lockdowns, and public wearing of masks Am J Trop Med Hyg 9 378-62