IncobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Blepharospasm in Toxin-Naïve Subjects: A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

被引:0
作者
Dimos D. Mitsikostas
Andrzej Dekundy
Kati Sternberg
Michael Althaus
Fernando Pagan
机构
[1] National and Kapodistrian University of Athens,1st Department of Neurology
[2] Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH,Department of Neurology
[3] Georgetown University Hospital Pasquerilla Healthcare Center,undefined
来源
Advances in Therapy | 2020年 / 37卷
关键词
Blepharospasm; Botulinum toxin type A; IncobotulinumtoxinA; Movement disorders;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to assess the efficacy/safety of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH) in botulinum neurotoxin-naïve subjects with blepharospasm. Botulinum neurotoxin-naïve subjects (≥ 12 months without botulinum neurotoxin treatment for blepharospasm) received single-dose incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U, 25 U, or placebo. Subjects were followed for 6–20 weeks (main period). Qualified subjects entered an open-label extension period and received another incobotulinumtoxinA injection (≤ 70 U). The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in the Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS) severity subscore at the main period of week 6. Other efficacy variables included changes in the Blepharospasm Disability Index score and JRS frequency subscore and sumscore. Adverse events were monitored. Sixty-one subjects were randomized (main period: incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U, n = 19; incobotulinumtoxinA 25 U, n = 22; placebo, n = 20); 39 entered the open-label extension period (9, 14, and 16 subjects from the incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U, incobotulinumtoxinA 25 U, and placebo groups [main period], respectively, changed to open-label extension period dosing). A statistically significantly greater reduction in JRS severity subscore was reported for subjects receiving incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U versus placebo (ANCOVA, least square mean difference: − 1.2, p = 0.0004). Subjects receiving incobotulinumtoxinA experienced improvements in other efficacy variables versus baseline and/or placebo. Sustained clinical improvements and low adverse event rates (22.2–42.1%) were observed. This is the second placebo-controlled, double-blind study that demonstrates favorable efficacy/safety of incobotulinumtoxinA in subjects with blepharospasm. IncobotulinumtoxinA is the first botulinum neurotoxin that could fulfill the American Academy of Neurology criteria for a Level A recommendation for blepharospasm.
引用
收藏
页码:4249 / 4265
页数:16
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Defazio G(2017)Blepharospasm 40 years later Mov Disord 32 498-509
[2]  
Hallett M(2012)The prevalence of primary dystonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mov Disord 27 1789-1796
[3]  
Jinnah HA(1998)Blepharospasm: past, present, and future Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 14 305-317
[4]  
Conte A(2017)Surgical approach to limiting skin contracture following protractor myectomy for essential blepharospasm Digit J Ophthalmol. 23 8-12
[5]  
Berardelli A(2011)Efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA (NT 201, Xeomin) in the treatment of blepharospasm—a randomized trial Mov Disord 26 1521-1528
[6]  
Steeves TD(2013)Sustained efficacy and safety of repeated incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin J Neural Transm (Vienna). 120 1345-1353
[7]  
Day L(2006)) injections in blepharospasm J Neural Transm (Vienna). 113 303-312
[8]  
Dykeman J(2001)Efficacy and safety of a new Botulinum Toxin Type A free of complexing proteins in the treatment of blepharospasm J Neurol 248 21-24
[9]  
Jette N(2016)Botulinum toxin: evidence-based medicine criteria in blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm Neurology. 86 1818-1826
[10]  
Pringsheim T(2020)Practice guideline update summary: botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, adult spasticity, and headache: report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Toxins (Basel). 12 E332-413