Phase I study of intraprostatic vaccine administration in men with locally recurrent or progressive prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
James L. Gulley
Christopher R. Heery
Ravi A. Madan
Beatriz A. Walter
Maria J. Merino
William L. Dahut
Kwong-Yok Tsang
Jeffrey Schlom
Peter A. Pinto
机构
[1] National Institutes of Health,Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute
[2] National Institutes of Health,Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute
[3] National Institutes of Health,Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute
[4] National Institutes of Health,Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute
来源
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy | 2013年 / 62卷
关键词
Cancer vaccine; Immunotherapy; PROSTVAC; Intratumoral vaccine; Prostate cancer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The primary end point of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of intraprostatic administration of PSA-TRICOM vaccine [encoding transgenes for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and 3 costimulatory molecules] in patients with locally recurrent or progressive prostate cancer. This trial was a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation with 6 patients each in cohorts 4 and 5 to gather more immunologic data. Nineteen of 21 patients enrolled had locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive radiation therapy, and 2 had no local therapy. All cohorts received initial subcutaneous vaccination with recombinant vaccinia (rV)-PSA-TRICOM and intraprostatic booster vaccinations with recombinant fowlpox (rF)-PSA-TRICOM. Cohorts 3–5 also received intraprostatic rF-GM-CSF. Cohort 5 received additional subcutaneous boosters with rF-PSA-TRICOM and rF-GM-CSF. Patients had pre- and post-treatment prostate biopsies, and analyses of peripheral and intraprostatic immune cells were performed. There were no dose-limiting toxicities, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common grade 2 adverse events were fever (38 %) and subcutaneous injection site reactions (33 %); the single grade 3 toxicity was transient fever. Overall, 19 of 21 patients on trial had stable (10) or improved (9) PSA values. There was a marked increase in CD4+ (p = 0.0002) and CD8+ (p = 0.0002) tumor infiltrates in post- versus pre-treatment tumor biopsies. Four of 9 patients evaluated had peripheral immune responses to PSA or NGEP. Intraprostatic administration of PSA-TRICOM is safe and feasible and can generate a significant immunologic response. Improved serum PSA kinetics and intense post-vaccination inflammatory infiltrates were seen in the majority of patients. Clinical trials examining clinical end points are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1521 / 1531
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Phase I study of intraprostatic vaccine administration in men with locally recurrent or progressive prostate cancer
    Gulley, James L.
    Heery, Christopher R.
    Madan, Ravi A.
    Walter, Beatriz A.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Dahut, William L.
    Tsang, Kwong-Yok
    Schlom, Jeffrey
    Pinto, Peter A.
    CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2013, 62 (09) : 1521 - 1531
  • [2] Phase I study with an autologous tumor cell vaccine for locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer
    Berger, Milton
    Kreutz, Fernando T.
    Horst, Jorge L.
    Baldi, Aline C.
    Koff, Walter J.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 10 (02): : 144 - 152
  • [3] Allogeneic whole-cell vaccine: a phase I/II study in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer
    Eaton, JD
    Perry, MJA
    Nicholson, S
    Guckian, M
    Russell, N
    Whelan, M
    Kirby, RS
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 89 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [4] Phase I/IIa clinical trial of a novel hTERT peptide vaccine in men with metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer
    Lilleby, Wolfgang
    Gaudernack, Gustav
    Brunsvig, Paal F.
    Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
    Schulz, Melanie
    Mills, Kate
    Hole, Knut Hakon
    Inderberg, Else Marit
    CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2017, 66 (07) : 891 - 901
  • [5] Morphological changes induced by intraprostatic PSA-based vaccine in prostate cancer biopsies (phase I clinical trial)
    Merino, Maria J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Moreno, Vanessa
    Gil, Sara
    Schlom, Jeffrey
    Gulley, James L.
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 78 : 72 - 78
  • [6] A phase I study of muscadine grape skin extract in men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: Safety, tolerability, and dose determination
    Paller, Channing J.
    Rudek, Michelle A.
    Zhou, Xian C.
    Wagner, William D.
    Hudson, Tamaro S.
    Anders, Nicole
    Hammers, Hans J.
    Dowling, Donna
    King, Serina
    Antonarakis, Emmanuel S.
    Drake, Charles G.
    Eisenberger, Mario A.
    Denmeade, Samuel R.
    Rosner, Gary L.
    Carducci, Michael A.
    PROSTATE, 2015, 75 (14) : 1518 - 1525
  • [7] Phase I/IIa clinical trial of a novel hTERT peptide vaccine in men with metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer
    Wolfgang Lilleby
    Gustav Gaudernack
    Paal F. Brunsvig
    Ljiljana Vlatkovic
    Melanie Schulz
    Kate Mills
    Knut Håkon Hole
    Else Marit Inderberg
    Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, 2017, 66 : 891 - 901
  • [8] Vaccine immunotherapy for prostate cancer: from mice to men
    David M. Lubaroff
    Daniel Vaena
    James A. Brown
    Pamela Zehr
    Karen C. Griffith
    Erica Brown
    Julie Eastman
    Kenneth Nepple
    Ambika Kattula
    Richard D. Williams
    Immunologic Research, 2014, 59 : 229 - 235
  • [9] Vaccine immunotherapy for prostate cancer: from mice to men
    Lubaroff, David M.
    Vaena, Daniel
    Brown, James A.
    Zehr, Pamela
    Griffith, Karen C.
    Brown, Erica
    Eastman, Julie
    Nepple, Kenneth
    Kattula, Ambika
    Williams, Richard D.
    IMMUNOLOGIC RESEARCH, 2014, 59 (1-3) : 229 - 235
  • [10] Salvage ablation for locally recurrent prostate cancer
    Lomas, Derek J.
    Woodrum, David A.
    Mynderse, Lance A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2021, 31 (03) : 188 - 193