Who Benefits from Ecosystem Services? A Case Study for Central Kalimantan, Indonesia

被引:0
作者
Aritta Suwarno
Lars Hein
Elham Sumarga
机构
[1] Wageningen University,Environmental System Analysis Group
[2] Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB),School of Life Science and Technology
来源
Environmental Management | 2016年 / 57卷
关键词
Ecosystem services; Beneficiaries; Benefits; Ecosystem accounting; Ecosystem management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There is increasing experience with the valuation of ecosystem services. However, to date, less attention has been devoted to who is actually benefiting from ecosystem services. This nevertheless is a key issue, in particular, if ecosystem services analysis and valuation is used to support environmental management. This study assesses and analyzes how the monetary benefits of seven ecosystem services are generated in Central Kalimantan Province, Indonesia, are distributed to different types of beneficiaries. We analyze the following ecosystem services: (1) timber production; (2) rattan collection; (3) jelutong resin collection; (4) rubber production (based on permanent agroforestry systems); (5) oil palm production on three management scales (company, plasma farmer, and independent smallholder); (6) paddy production; and (7) carbon sequestration. Our study shows that the benefits generated from these services differ markedly between the stakeholders, which we grouped into private, public, and household entities. The distribution of these benefits is strongly influenced by government policies and in particular benefit sharing mechanisms. Hence, land-use change and policies influencing land-use change can be expected to have different impacts on different stakeholders. Our study also shows that the benefits generated by oil palm conversion, a main driver for land-use change in the province, are almost exclusively accrued by companies and at this point in time are shared unequally with local stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 344
页数:13
相关论文
共 152 条
  • [1] Abram NK(2014)Spatially explicit perceptions of ecosystem services and land cover change in forested regions of Borneo Ecosyst Serv 7 116-127
  • [2] Meijaard E(2009)Carbon dioxide emission in land use transition to plantation J Litbang Pertan 28 119-126
  • [3] Ancrenaz M(2014)Ecological impacts of oil palm agriculture on forest mammals in plantation estates and smallholdings Biodivers Conserv 23 1175-1191
  • [4] Agus F(2014)From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments Ecol Soc 63 616-626
  • [5] Runtunuwu E(2007)What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units Ecol Econ 6 014010-291
  • [6] June T(2011)Remotely sensed forest cover loss shows high spatial and temporal variation across Sumatera and Kalimantan, Indonesia 2000–2008 Environ Res Lett 13 277-287
  • [7] Azhar B(2011)Time-series analysis of multi-resolution optical imagery for quantifying forest cover loss in Sumatra and Kalimantan, Indonesia Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinform 3 283-7564
  • [8] Lindenmayer DB(2013)Oil palm plantations in Indonesia : the implications for migration, settlement/resettlement and local economic development INTECH 109 7559-13
  • [9] Wood J(2012)Carbon emissions from forest conversion by Kalimantan oil palm plantations Nat Clim Chang 12 1-28
  • [10] Bagstad KJ(2012)Committed carbon emissions, deforestation, and community land conversion from oil palm plantation expansion in West Kalimantan, Indonesia Proc Natl Acad Sci 7 21-183