The cost-effectiveness of candesartan-based antihypertensive treatment for the prevention of nonfatal stroke: results from the Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly

被引:0
作者
J Lundkvist
M Ekman
B Kartman
J Carlsson
L Jönsson
H Lithell
机构
[1] Stockholm Health Economics,Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences
[2] Health Economics & Outcomes Research,undefined
[3] AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal,undefined
[4] Biostatistics,undefined
[5] AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal,undefined
[6] Uppsala University,undefined
来源
Journal of Human Hypertension | 2005年 / 19卷
关键词
stroke; cost-utility; cost-effectiveness; candesartan; elderly;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Patients who survive a first stroke are often left with permanent disabilities, and have significant needs for rehabilitation and long-term care. Antihypertensive treatment reduces the risk of cardiovascular events such as stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of candesartan-based antihypertensive treatment for the prevention of nonfatal stroke. The cost-effectiveness analysis was based on data from Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE), where patients were randomly assigned to receive the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan or placebo, with open-label active antihypertensive treatment added as needed. The analysis was carried out using a Markov model, which combined clinical and resource utilization data from SCOPE with Swedish retail prices for drugs and unit costs for in-patient stays, and outpatient visits. The cost per patient was 1949 EUR in the candesartan group and 1578 EUR in the control group. The largest share of the cost was attributed to antihypertensive treatment in the candesartan group and to the long-term cost of stroke in the control group. Candesartan-based antihypertensive treatment was associated with 0.0289 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient and an incremental cost per QALY gained of approximately 13 000 EUR. Sensitivity analyses showed that these results were fairly stable. In conclusion, the cost per QALY gained with candesartan-based antihypertensive treatment lies within the range of society's willingness to pay for health gains. The results indicate that candesartan-based antihypertensive treatment is cost-effective for the prevention of nonfatal stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 576
页数:7
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Caird FI(1987)Chronic brain failure: the silent epidemic NZ Med J 100 13-16
  • [2] Cargill D(1997)Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study Lancet 349 1269-1276
  • [3] Murray CJ(1991)Cost-effectiveness analysis of hypertension treatment — a review of methodological issues Health Policy 19 55-77
  • [4] Lopez AD(1992)Economic evaluation of hypertension treatment Int J Technol Assess Health Care 8 506-523
  • [5] Johannesson M(1994)Cerebrovascular consequences of hypertension Lancet 344 519-521
  • [6] Jonsson B(1994)Risk factors for vascular dementia: a review Dementia 5 137-144
  • [7] Johannesson M(1990)Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, Prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias Lancet 335 765-774
  • [8] Strandgaard S(1991)Morbidity and mortality in the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension (STOP-Hypertension) Lancet 338 1281-1285
  • [9] Paulson OB(1996)Cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment Clin Exp Hypertens 18 399-413
  • [10] Skoog I(1993)The cost-effectiveness of treating hypertension in elderly people — an analysis of the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension (STOP Hypertension) J Intern Med 234 317-323