Environmental Policy, Innovation, and Productivity Growth: Controlling the Effects of Regulation and Endogeneity

被引:0
作者
Erik Hille
Patrick Möbius
机构
[1] HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management,
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2019年 / 73卷
关键词
Environmental regulation; Productivity growth; Innovation; Shadow prices; Energy prices; Endogeneity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We analyze the environmental regulation-productivity nexus and add to the literature in two main ways. First, shadow prices of energy and industrial energy prices are employed as relative measures of policy stringency. To ensure the robustness of the results, the model is also estimated for five alternative measures that have been applied in prior research. Second, we address the endogeneity of environmental regulation, innovation, and trade openness. A cross-country multi-sectoral dataset is utilized, including newly industrialized countries and former transition economies. The estimates show that the positive effects of increases in environmental policy stringency on productivity, which have often been reported in the more recent studies, change to mainly insignificant effects once simultaneity is controlled for. Hence, no support for the strong Porter Hypothesis can be found. Instead, stricter environmental regulation fosters innovation and, therefore, has an indirect, yet not decisive, positive effect on productivity growth.
引用
收藏
页码:1315 / 1355
页数:40
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D(2006)Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth J Eur Econ Assoc 4 37-74
[2]  
Aghion P(2015)Identification properties of recent production function estimators Econometrica 83 2411-2451
[3]  
Zilibotti F(2006)Joseph Schumpeter lecture: appropriate growth policy—a unifying framework J Eur Econ Assoc 4 269-314
[4]  
Ackerberg DA(1997)Corporate governance, competition policy and industrial policy Eur Econ Rev 41 797-805
[5]  
Caves K(2017)Environmental policies and productivity growth: evidence across industries and firms J Environ Econ Manag 81 209-226
[6]  
Frazer G(2015)The competitiveness impacts of climate change mitigation policies J Assoc Environ Resour Econ 2 565-595
[7]  
Aghion P(2002)Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and U.S. food manufacturing Am J Agric Econ 84 887-901
[8]  
Howitt P(2016)Measuring climate policy stringency: a shadow price approach Int Tax Public Financ 23 607-639
[9]  
Aghion P(2002)A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis Econ Lett 75 355-360
[10]  
Dewatripont M(2013)The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Environ Econ Policy 7 2-22