Factors influencing use of telegenetic counseling: perceptions of health care professionals in Sweden

被引:0
作者
Rebecka Pestoff
Peter Johansson
Per Nilsen
Cecilia Gunnarsson
机构
[1] Linköping University,Centre for Rare Diseases in Southeast Region of Sweden
[2] Linköping University,Division of Community Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Health Sciences
[3] Linköping University,Department of Genetics
[4] Linköping University,Department of Social and Welfare Studies
[5] Linköping University,Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Medical and Health Sciences
[6] Linköping University,Department of Clinical and Experimental Science
来源
Journal of Community Genetics | 2019年 / 10卷
关键词
Genetic counseling; Telegenetic; Implementation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Genetic counseling services are increasing in demand and limited in access due to barriers such as lack of professional genetic counselors, vast geographic distances, and physical hurdles. This research focuses on an alternative mode of delivery for genetic counseling in Sweden, in order to overcome some of the mentioned barriers. The aim of this study is to identify factors that influence the implementation and use of telegenetic counseling in clinical practice, according to health care professionals in Southeast Sweden. Telegenetic counseling refers to the use of video-conferencing as a means to provide genetic counseling. Qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 16 genetic counseling providers took place and phenomenographic analysis was applied. Significant excerpts were identified in each transcript, which led to sub-categories that constructed the main findings. Three categories emerged from the data: (1) requirements for optimal use, (2) impact on clinical practice, and (3) patient benefits. Each category consists of two or three sub-categories, in total seven sub-categories. These findings could potentially be used to improve access and uptake of telegenetic counseling in Sweden and in other countries with a similar health care system. This could benefit not only remote patient populations, as described in previous research, but also large family groups and patients experiencing obstacles in accessing genetic counseling, such as those with a psychiatric illness or time constraints, and be a useful way to make genetic counseling available in the new era of genomics.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 415
页数:8
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]  
Abrams DJ(2006)A comparison of patient satisfaction with telehealth and on-site consultations: a pilot study for prenatal genetic counseling J Genet Couns 15 199-205
[2]  
Geier MR(2009)Telephoned BRCA1/2 genetic test results: prevalence, practice, and patient satisfaction J Genet Couns 18 447-463
[3]  
Baumanis L(2016)Alternate service delivery models in Cancer genetic counseling: a mini-review Front Oncol 6 120-559
[4]  
Evans JP(2008)Evaluation of genetic counseling for hereditary cancer by videoconference in British Columbia B C Med J 50 554-38
[5]  
Callanan N(2009)Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science Implement Sci 4 50-224
[6]  
Susswein LR(2003)Psychological distress in the 5-year period after predictive testing for Huntington's disease Eur J Hum Genet 11 30-247
[7]  
Buchanan AH(2017)Telemedicine in dermatology: findings and experiences worldwide - a systematic literature review J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol 32 215-776
[8]  
Rahm AK(1987)Measuring ambivalence to science J Res Sci Teach 24 247-64
[9]  
Williams JL(2012)Telegenetics: a systematic review of telemedicine in genetics services Genet Med 14 765-942
[10]  
d'Agincourt-Canning L(2015)Teleophtalmology for first nations clients at risk of diabetic retinopathy: a mixed methods evalutaion JMIR Med Inf 3 e10-40