A phase Ib dose-escalation study of the MEK inhibitor trametinib in combination with the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor GSK2126458 in patients with advanced solid tumors

被引:0
作者
J. E. Grilley-Olson
P. L. Bedard
A. Fasolo
M. Cornfeld
L. Cartee
A. R. Abdul Razak
L.-A. Stayner
Y. Wu
R. Greenwood
R. Singh
C. B. Lee
J. Bendell
H. A. Burris
G. Del Conte
C. Sessa
J. R. Infante
机构
[1] University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center,Division of Hematology/Oncology
[2] University Health Network- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto,Unità Nuovi Farmaci e Terapie Innovative Dept. Medical Oncology 1Q
[3] IRCCS Scientific Institute,A Ospedale San Raffaele
[4] GlaxoSmithKline Plc,undefined
[5] RTP,undefined
[6] Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation,undefined
[7] UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center,undefined
[8] Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology,undefined
[9] PLLC,undefined
来源
Investigational New Drugs | 2016年 / 34卷
关键词
Trametinib; GSK2126458; MEK inhibitor; PI3K inhibitor; Phase I clinical trial;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction This Phase Ib trial investigated the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose for the pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, GSK2126458 (GSK458), and trametinib combination when administered to patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating doses of GSK458 (once or twice daily, and continuous or intermittent) and trametinib following a zone-based 3 + 3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Assessments included monitoring for adverse events and response, and evaluating pharmacokinetic (PK) measures. Archival tissue and circulating free DNA samples were collected to assess biomarkers of response in the PI3K and RAS pathways. Results 57 patients were enrolled onto the continuous dosing cohort and 12 patients onto an intermittent BID dosing cohort. Two MTDs were established for the continuous daily dosing: 2 mg of GSK458 with 1.0 mg of trametinib or 1.0 mg of GSK458 with 1.5 mg of trametinib; no MTD was determined in the intermittent dosing cohort. The most frequent adverse events were rash (74 %) and diarrhea (61 %). Dose interruptions due to adverse events occurred in 42 % of patients. No significant PK interaction was observed. One patient achieved partial response and 12 patients had stable disease >16 weeks. Mutations in RAS/RAF/PI3K were detected in 70 % of patients, but no pattern emerged between response and mutational status. Conclusion GSK458 plus trametinib is poorly tolerated, due to skin and GI-related toxicities. Responses were minimal, despite enrichment for PI3K/RAS pathway driven tumors, which may be due to overlapping toxicities precluding sufficient dose exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:740 / 749
页数:9
相关论文
共 161 条
[1]  
McCubrey JA(2006)Roles of the RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathways in malignant transformation and drug resistance Adv Enzym Regul 46 249-279
[2]  
Steelman LS(2008)Effective use of PI3K and MEK inhibitors to treat mutant Kras G12D and PIK3CA H1047R murine lung cancers Nat Med 14 1351-1356
[3]  
Abrams SL(2009)In vivo antitumor activity of MEK and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors in basal-like breast cancer models Clin Cancer Res 15 4649-4664
[4]  
Lee JT(2009)Basal subtype and MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK)-phosphoinositide 3-kinase feedback signaling determine susceptibility of breast cancer cells to MEK inhibition Cancer Res 69 565-572
[5]  
Chang F(2012)Safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy data for the oral MEK inhibitor trametinib: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial Lancet Oncol 13 773-781
[6]  
Bertrand FE(2009)New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer 45 228-247
[7]  
Navolanic PM(2008)Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics Nat Med 14 985-990
[8]  
Terrian DM(2010)Bayesian dose finding in oncology for drug combinations by copula regression J R Stat Soc: Series C (Applied Statistics) 59 543-544
[9]  
Franklin RA(2014)A Bayesian dose-finding design for drug combination clinical trials based on the logistic model Pharm Stat 13 247-257
[10]  
D’Assoro AB(2005)Flexible Bayesian methods for cancer phase I clinical trials. Dose escalation with overdose control Stat Med 24 2183-2196