Analysis and comparison of heat flux of landfast ice during 2016 in the Prydz Bay, Antarctica

被引:0
作者
Guanghua Hao
Jie Su
Qinghua Yang
Long Lin
Shutao Cao
机构
[1] Ministry of Natural Resources,Key Laboratory of Marine Hazards Forecasting, National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center
[2] Ocean University of China,Physical Oceanography Laboratory
[3] Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao),School of Atmospheric Sciences
[4] Sun Yat-sen University,Second Institute of Oceanography
[5] Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai),undefined
[6] Ministry of Natural Resources,undefined
来源
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2021年 / 40卷
关键词
energy flux; observation; evaluation; CICE 6; reanalysis data;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Long term in situ atmospheric observation of the landfast ice nearby Zhongshan Station in the Prydz Bay was performed from April to November 2016. The in situ observation, including the conventional meteorological elements and turbulent flux, enabled this study to evaluate the sea ice surface energy budget process. Using in situ observations, three different reanalysis datasets from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Interim Re-analysis (ERA-Interim), National Centers for Environmental Prediction Reanalysis2 (NCEP R2), and Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA55), and the Los Alamos sea ice model, CICE, output for surface fluxes were evaluated. The observed sensible heat flux (SH) and net longwave radiation showed seasonal variation with increasing temperature. Air temperature rose from the middle of October as the solar elevation angle increased. The ice surface lost more energy by outgoing longwave radiation as temperature increased, while the shortwave radiation showed obvious increases from the middle of October. The oceanic heat flux demonstrated seasonal variation and decreased with time, where the average values were 21 W/m2 and 11 W/m2, before and after August, respectively. The comparisons with in situ observations show that, SH and LE (latent heat flux) of JRA55 dataset had the smallest bias and mean absolute error (MAE), and those of NCEP R2 data show the largest differences. The ERA-Interim dataset had the highest spatial resolution, but performance was modest with bias and MAE between JRA55 and NCEP R2 compare with in situ observation. The CICE results (SH and LE) were consistent with the observed data but did not demonstrate the amplitude of inner seasonal variation. The comparison revealed better shortwave and longwave radiation stimulation based on the ERA-Interim forcing in CICE than the radiation of ERA-Interim. The average sea ice temperature decreased in June and July and increased after September, which was similar to the temperature measured by buoys, with a bias and MAE of 0.9°C and 1.0°C, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 79
页数:8
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Allison I(1982)Seasonal variations in the surface energy exchanges over antarctic sea ice and coastal waters Annals of Glaciology 3 12-16
  • [2] Tivendale C M(1995)The surface energy balance of antarctic snow and blue ice Journal of Applied Meteorology 34 902-926
  • [3] Akerman G J(2000)Eddy covariance measurements of evaporation from Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada Water Resources Research 36 1069-1078
  • [4] Bintanja R(2017)Positive trend in the Antarctic sea ice cover and associated changes in surface temperature Journal of Climate 30 2251-2267
  • [5] Van Den Broeke M R(2019)Surface energy balance on the Antarctic plateau as measured with an automatic weather station during 2014 Advances in Polar Science 30 93-105
  • [6] Blanken P D(2011)The Japanese 55-year reanalysis “JRA-55”: an interim report Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere: SOLA 7 149-152
  • [7] Rouse W R(2017)Diagnosing sea ice from the North American multi model ensemble and implications on mid-latitude winter climate Climate Dynamics 53 7237-7250
  • [8] Culf A D(2020)Spectral albedo of coastal landfast sea ice in Prydz Bay. Antarctica Journal of Glaciology 67 1-11
  • [9] Comiso J C(2002)NCEP-DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2) Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 83 1631-1644
  • [10] Gersten R A(2001)Sensitivity of modelled Antarctic climate to surface and boundary-layer flux parametrizations Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 127 779-794