Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Complications in Transvaginal Approach in Laparoscopic Surgery

被引:0
作者
Andrzej L. Komorowski
Francisco Alba Mesa
Małgorzata M. Bała
Jerzy W. Mituś
Wojciech M. Wysocki
机构
[1] Maria Skłodowska—Curie Memorial Institute,Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Centre
[2] Hospital San Juan de Dios,Consorcio Sanitario Publico del Aljarafe
[3] Jagiellonian University Medical College,2nd Department of Internal Medicine
[4] Jagiellonian University Medical College,Department of Anatomy
来源
Indian Journal of Surgery | 2015年 / 77卷
关键词
Transvaginal Surgery Complications; Natural Orifice Translumenal Surgery; NOTES; NOSE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transvaginal access is the most popular natural orifice translumenal technique in the minimally invasive surgery. Reviews on non-gynecological transvaginal approach morbidities reveal that rates vary greatly. A systematic review of transvaginal approach in non-gynecological intraabdominal procedures was carried out to assess the risk of complications. A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library from the inception of these databases to March 2012. The following keywords were searched: “transvaginal”, “NOTES”, “single incision”, and “single port”. From the total of 231 potentially eligible abstracts, 87 papers were retrieved and evaluated as fulfilling the eligibility criteria. The final analysis included 32 articles. The overall complications rate was 4.4 %, and complications related to the transvaginal port reached 2.4 %. Conversion rate to open surgery was 3.4 %. The incidence of postoperative urinary tract infection was 0.8 %. The mean operative time was 119 min. The mean hospital stay was 3.1 days (range 6 h–12 days). The technique of transvaginal access can offer several advantages for a patient and is associated with an acceptable rate of complications.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 862
页数:9
相关论文
共 320 条
[1]  
Hackethal A(2010)Establishing transvaginal NOTES for gynecological and surgical indications: benefits, limits, and patient experience Endoscopy 42 875-878
[2]  
Sucke J(2009)Single-port access laparoscopic radical left colectomy in humans Dis Colon Rectum 52 1797-1801
[3]  
Oehmke F(1986)Meta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 7 177-188
[4]  
Munstedt K(2005)Treatment of rectosigmoid endometriosis by laparoscopically assisted vaginal rectosigmoidectomy Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet 91 27-31
[5]  
Padberg W(2011)Feasibility of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted living donor nephrectomy: is kidney vaginal delivery the approach of the future? Eur Urol 59 1019-1025
[6]  
Tinneberg HR(2010)Feasibility of transvaginal NOTES-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy Eur Urol 57 233-237
[7]  
Bucher P(2009)Challenges and lessons learned from NOTES cholecystectomy initial experience: a stepwise approach from the laboratory to clinical application J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Surg 16 249-254
[8]  
Pugin F(2011)Sleeve gastrectomy in the treatment of morbid obesity. Study results and first experiences with the transvaginal hybrid NOTES technique Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 82 675-683
[9]  
Morel P(2009)MANOS: Transvaginal cholecystectomies: preliminary report Cir Esp 85 292-297
[10]  
DerSimonian R(2011)Hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective human series Surg Endosc 25 19-22