Variants in circadian genes and prostate cancer risk: a population-based study in China

被引:0
作者
L W Chu
Y Zhu
K Yu
T Zheng
H Yu
Y Zhang
I Sesterhenn
A P Chokkalingam
K N Danforth
M-C Shen
F Z Stanczyk
Y-T Gao
A W Hsing
机构
[1] Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program,Division of Cancer Prevention
[2] Office of Preventive Oncology,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health
[3] National Cancer Institute,Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics
[4] National Institutes of Health,Department of Epidemiology
[5] Yale University School of Medicine,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[6] National Cancer Institute,Department of Epidemiology
[7] National Institutes of Health,undefined
[8] Armed Forces Institute of Pathology,undefined
[9] School of Public Health,undefined
[10] University of California at Berkeley,undefined
[11] Shanghai Tumor Hospital,undefined
[12] Fudan University,undefined
[13] Keck School of Medicine,undefined
[14] University of Southern California,undefined
[15] Shanghai Cancer Institute,undefined
来源
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases | 2008年 / 11卷
关键词
circadian genes; genetic polymorphisms; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Circadian genes influence a variety of biological processes that are important in prostate tumorigenesis including metabolism. To determine if variants in circadian genes alter prostate cancer risk, we genotyped five variants in five circadian genes in a population-based case–control study conducted in China (187 cases and 242 controls). These variants included CRY2 rs1401417:G>C, CSNK1E rs1005473:A>C, NPAS2 rs2305160:G>A, PER1 rs2585405:G>C and PER3 54-bp repeat length variant. Men with the cryptochrome 2 (CRY2)-variant C allele had a significant 1.7-fold increased prostate cancer risk (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1–2.7) relative to those with the GG genotype. This risk increased to 4.1-fold (95% CI, 2.2–8.0) in men who also had greater insulin resistance (IR) as compared to men with the GG genotype and less IR. In contrast, among men with less IR, the NPAS2-variant A allele was associated with decreased prostate cancer risk (odds ratio=0.5, 95% CI, 0.3–1.0) as compared to the GG genotype. Our findings, although in need of confirmation, suggest that variations in circadian genes may alter prostate cancer risk and some biological processes may modify this effect.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 348
页数:6
相关论文
共 208 条
[21]  
Lejeune-Lenain C(2001)Polymorphic markers in the EMBO Rep 2 342-415
[22]  
Van Cauter E(2003) gene and prostate cancer risk: a population-based case–control study Sleep 26 413-50
[23]  
Desir D(2002)Association of structural polymorphisms in the human period3 gene with delayed sleep phase syndrome Cell 111 41-658
[24]  
Beyloos M(2006)A length polymorphism in the circadian clock gene Per3 is linked to delayed sleep phase syndrome and extreme diurnal preference Nat Genet 38 652-637
[25]  
Franckson JR(2007)The circadian gene period2 plays an important role in tumor suppression and DNA damage response Nat Genet 39 631-644
[26]  
Kubo T(2007)A common variant associated with prostate cancer in European and African populations Nat Genet 39 638-649
[27]  
Ozasa K(2007)Genome-wide association study identifies a second prostate cancer susceptibility variant at 8q24 Nat Genet 39 645-2895
[28]  
Mikami K(2005)Multiple regions within 8q24 independently affect risk for prostate cancer Eur J Cancer 41 2887-1983
[29]  
Wakai K(2006)Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer identifies a second risk locus at 8q24 Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15 1977-1373
[30]  
Fujino Y(2004)Hyperinsulinaemia: a prospective risk factor for lethal clinical prostate cancer Curr Biol 14 1367-1139