The protective effect of SnF2 containing toothpastes and solution on enamel surfaces subjected to erosion and abrasion in situ

被引:17
作者
Hove L.H. [1 ]
Stenhagen K.R. [1 ]
Holme B. [2 ]
Tveit A.B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Cariology and Gerodontology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, P.O. Box 1109, Blindern
[2] SINTEF Materials and Chemistry, Oslo
关键词
Dental erosion; In situ; Toothpaste;
D O I
10.1007/s40368-013-0107-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Stannous fluoride solutions have shown promising protective effect against erosion/abrasion, but the effect of SnF2 toothpastes is uncertain. Aim: The aim of the study was to test the inhibiting effect of two SnF2 toothpastes and a SnF2 solution against erosive/abrasive wear in a single-blind, randomised in situ study, using a white light interferometer. Methods: Sixteen human molars were each divided into four specimens, mounted on mouth appliances and worn by 8 volunteers for 9 days. Specimens were brushed with toothpaste twice each day for 30 s either with fluoride-free toothpaste or toothpastes including SnF2. Toothpaste was left on the surface for 90 additional seconds. Group 1, fluoride-free toothpaste; Group 2, toothpaste A (0.4 % SnF2, Solidox); Group 3, toothpaste B (0.454 % SnF2, Oral-B®); Group 4, brushed with fluoride-free toothpaste (30 s) and treated for 2 min with a 0.4 % SnF2 solution (1,000 ppm F). To mimic gastric reflux/vomit, specimens were etched for 2 min twice a day (0.01 M HCl). Procedures were performed extra-orally. Results: The mean enamel wear (in μm) for the control specimens was: -29.2 ± SD 10.5; for group 2 -14.5 SD ± 9.3; for group 3 -33.3 SD ± 7.4, and for group 4 +0.4 SD ± 1.3. The specimens treated with SnF2 solution and toothpaste A showed significantly lower enamel wear than the control group. Toothpaste B gave no significant reduction in enamel wear. Conclusions: The SnF2 solution fully protected the enamel surface against erosive and abrasive challenges. The SnF2 toothpaste A (Solidox) showed less, but significant protection of the enamel, while no statistically significant protection was demonstrated by SnF2 toothpaste B (Oral-B® Pro-Expert). © 2014 European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 243
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Attin T., Buchalla W., Gollner M., Hellwig E., Use of variable remineralization periods to improve the abrasion resistance of previously eroded enamel, Caries Res, 34, pp. 48-52, (2000)
  • [2] Babcock F.D., King J.C., Jordan T.H., The reaction of stannous fluoride and hydroxyapatite, J Dent Res, 57, pp. 933-938, (1978)
  • [3] Barkvoll P., Rolla G., Lagerlof F., Effect of sodium lauryl sulfate on the deposition of alkali-soluble fluoride on enamel in vitro, Caries Res, 22, pp. 139-144, (1988)
  • [4] Barlow A.P., Sufi F., Mason S.C., Evaluation of different fluoridated dentifrice formulations using an in situ erosion remineralization model, J Clin Dent, 20, pp. 192-198, (2009)
  • [5] Christoffersen J., Christoffersen M.R., Kibalczyc W., Perdok W.G., Kinetics of dissolution and growth of calcium fluoride and effects of phosphate, Acta Odontol Scand, 46, pp. 325-336, (1988)
  • [6] Davis W.B., Winter P.J., The effect of abrasion on enamel and dentine and exposure to dietary acid, Br Dent J, 148, pp. 253-256, (1980)
  • [7] Ellingsen J.E., Rolla G., Treatment of dentin with stannous fluoride-SEM and electron microprobe study, Scand J Dent Res, 95, pp. 281-286, (1987)
  • [8] Faller R.V., Eversole S.L., Tzeghai G.E., Enamel protection: a comparison of marketed dentifrice performance against dental erosion, Am J Dent, 24, pp. 205-210, (2011)
  • [9] Ganss C., Lussi A., Grunau O., Klimek J., Schlueter N., Conventional and anti-erosion fluoride toothpastes: effect on enamel erosion and erosion-abrasion, Caries Res, 45, pp. 581-589, (2011)
  • [10] Ganss C., Neutard L., von Hinckeldey J., Klimek J., Schlueter N., Efficacy of a tin/fluoride rinse: a randomized in situ trial on erosion, J Dent Res, 89, pp. 1214-1218, (2010)