Prediction of tropospheric ozone concentration using artificial neural networks at traffic and background urban locations in Novi Sad, Serbia

被引:0
作者
Slavica Malinović-Milićević
Yaroslav Vyklyuk
Gorica Stanojević
Milan M. Radovanović
Dejan Doljak
Nina B. Ćurčić
机构
[1] University of Novi Sad,ACIMSI
[2] Bukovinian University, University Center for Meteorology and Environmental Modelling
[3] Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts,Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijic”
[4] South Ural State University,Institute of Sports, Tourism and Service
来源
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2021年 / 193卷
关键词
Air pollution; Tropospheric ozone; Neural networks; Novi Sad (Serbia);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we described generation and performances of feedforward neural network models that could be used for a day ahead predictions of the daily maximum 1-h ozone concentration (1hO3) and 8-h average ozone concentration (8hO3) at one traffic and one background station in the urban area of Novi Sad, Serbia. The six meteorological variables for the day preceding the forecast and forecast day, ozone concentrations in the day preceding the forecast, the number of the day of the year, and the number of the weekday for which ozone prediction was performed were utilized as inputs. The three-layer perceptron neural network models with the best performance were chosen by testing with different numbers of neurons in the hidden layer and different activation functions. The mean bias error, mean absolute error, root mean squared error, correlation coefficient, and index of agreement or Willmott’s Index for the validation data for 1hO3 forecasting were 0.005 μg m−3, 12.149 μg m−3, 15.926 μg m−3, 0.988, and 0.950, respectively, for the traffic station (Dnevnik), and − 0.565 μg m−3, 10.101 μg m−3, 12.962 μg m−3, 0.911, and 0.953, respectively, for the background station (Liman). For 8hO3 forecasting, statistical indicators were − 1.126 μg m−3, 10.614 μg m−3, 12.962 μg m−3, 0.910, and 0.948 respectively for the station Dnevnik and − 0.001 μg m−3, 8.574 μg m−3, 10.741 μg m−3, 0.936, and 0.966, respectively, for the station Liman. According to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, there is no significant difference between measured and predicted data. Models showed a good performance in forecasting days with the high values over a certain threshold.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 130 条
[1]  
Abdul-Wahab SA(2005)Principal component and multiple regression analysis in modelling of ground-level ozone and factors affecting its concentrations Enviromental Modelling and Software 20 1263-1271
[2]  
Bakheit CS(1995)Weekday versus weekend ambient ozone concentrations: discussion and hypothesis with focus on northern California Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 45 161-180
[3]  
Al-Alawi SM(2005)Ambient ozone and mortality Epidemiology 16 427-429
[4]  
Altshuller SI(2006)The exposure-response curve for ozone and risk of mortality and the adequacy of current ozone regulations Environtal Health Perspective 114 532-536
[5]  
Arcado TD(2015)Analysis of surface ozone using a recurrent neural network Science of Total Environment 514 379-387
[6]  
Lawson DR(2008)Surface ozone concentrations and ecosystem health: past trends and a guide to future projections Science of Total Environment 400 257-269
[7]  
Bates VD(2003)Comparative assessment of neural networks and regression models for forecasting summertime ozone in Athens Science of Total Environment 313 1-13
[8]  
Bell M(1997)Comparing neural networks and regression models for ozone forecasting Journal of Air and Waste Management Association 47 653-663
[9]  
Peng R(2005)Stochastic model to forecast ground-level ozone concentration at urban and rural areas Chemosphere 61 1379-1389
[10]  
Dominici F(2010)Transformation of nitrogen dioxide into ozone and prediction of ozone concentrations using multiple linear regression techniques Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 165 475-489