Experimental study on injection of ferrous sulphate for remediation of a clayey soil contaminated with hexavalent chromium

被引:0
作者
Guang Hu
Yong He
Kao-fei Zhu
Zhao Zhang
Wei Lou
Ke-neng Zhang
Yong-gui Chen
Qiong Wang
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring (Central South University),School of Geosciences and Info
[2] Ministry of Education,Physics
[3] Central South University,Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Geotechnical Engineering
[4] Hunan HIKEE Environmental Technology CO.,undefined
[5] LTD,undefined
[6] Tongji University,undefined
来源
Environmental Earth Sciences | 2023年 / 82卷
关键词
Hexavalent chromium; Soil remediation; Ferrous sulphate; Clayey soil; Pressure injection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In-situ remediation of the Cr(VI) contaminated clayey soil remains challenging due to the low hydraulic conductivity and high ion adsorption capacity of the clays. In this study, the injection tests of ferrous sulphate (FeSO4) for a clayey soil contaminated with hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) were performed to explore the feasibility of FeSO4 solution for remediation of Cr(VI) contaminated soil under different injection pressures. The results show that the injection of FeSO4 solution under the pressure of 30 kPa, 70 kPa, and 100 kPa caused the hydraulic conductivities of the specimens to decrease by 36.5%, 38.7% and 32.2%, respectively. This phenomenon could be attributed to the formation of the mixed iron(III)/chromium(III) hydroxide, a process for which scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis provided direct evidence. Moreover, the mobility capacity of Fe(II) was stronger under high pressures (70 kPa, 100 kPa) as indicated by Fe profiles in specimens after remediation under different injection pressures. The range of iron increment at 100 kPa was 3.2–11.9 g/kg. However, the maximum iron increment at 30 kPa was only 5 g/kg and the migration of Fe(II) was limited, which was less than 2.5 cm. In addition, the injection pressure of 70 kPa was the most efficient for remediation of Cr(VI) contaminated soil under the experimental condition in present work, which the remediation efficiency was 87.43–95.12%. As injection pressure increased, Cr(VI) leaching increased. Therefore, these experimental results can be used as a reference for remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated soil by in-situ injection.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]  
Cecchin I(2021)Remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated clay soil by injection of nanoscale zero valent iron (nZVI) Water Air Soil Pollut 232 286-394
[2]  
Reginatto C(2003)Utilization of fly ash for stabilization/solidification (S/S) of heavy metal contaminated soils Eng Geol 70 377-150
[3]  
Siveris W(2012)Experimental assessment of chromium mobilization from polluted soil by washing Chem Eng Trans 28 145-3213
[4]  
Schnaid F(2003)Chromium remediation or release? Effect of iron(II) sulfate addition on chromium(VI) leaching from columns of chromite ore processing residue Environ Sci Technol 37 3206-593
[5]  
Thomé A(2019)A review on cleaner strategies for chromium industrial wastewater: present research and future perspective J Clean Prod 228 580-141
[6]  
Reddy KR(2016)Equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies of adsorption of Sr(II) from aqueous solution onto GMZ bentonite Environ Earth Sci 75 807-1018
[7]  
Dermatas D(2016)Influence of pore fluid concentration on water retention properties of compacted GMZ01 bentonite Appl Clay Sci 129 131-248
[8]  
Meng X(2019)Experimental and numerical study on heavy metal contaminant migration and retention behavior of engineered barrier in tailings pond Environ Pollut 252 1010-209
[9]  
Di Palma L(2019)Effects of K Eng Geol 249 241-1063
[10]  
Mancini D(2016) solutions on swelling behavior of compacted GMZ bentonite J Hazard Mater 306 203-247