The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning

被引:0
作者
Kyoungwon Seo
Joice Tang
Ido Roll
Sidney Fels
Dongwook Yoon
机构
[1] Seoul National University of Science and Technology,Department of Applied Artificial Intelligence
[2] The University of British Columbia,Department of Computer Science
[3] Technion-Israel Institute of Technology,Faculty of Education in Science and Technology
[4] The University of British Columbia,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
来源
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education | / 18卷
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Boundary; Learner–instructor interaction; Online learning; Speed dating;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems offer effective support for online learning and teaching, including personalizing learning for students, automating instructors’ routine tasks, and powering adaptive assessments. However, while the opportunities for AI are promising, the impact of AI systems on the culture of, norms in, and expectations about interactions between students and instructors are still elusive. In online learning, learner–instructor interaction (inter alia, communication, support, and presence) has a profound impact on students’ satisfaction and learning outcomes. Thus, identifying how students and instructors perceive the impact of AI systems on their interaction is important to identify any gaps, challenges, or barriers preventing AI systems from achieving their intended potential and risking the safety of these interactions. To address this need for forward-looking decisions, we used Speed Dating with storyboards to analyze the authentic voices of 12 students and 11 instructors on diverse use cases of possible AI systems in online learning. Findings show that participants envision adopting AI systems in online learning can enable personalized learner–instructor interaction at scale but at the risk of violating social boundaries. Although AI systems have been positively recognized for improving the quantity and quality of communication, for providing just-in-time, personalized support for large-scale settings, and for improving the feeling of connection, there were concerns about responsibility, agency, and surveillance issues. These findings have implications for the design of AI systems to ensure explainability, human-in-the-loop, and careful data collection and presentation. Overall, contributions of this study include the design of AI system storyboards which are technically feasible and positively support learner–instructor interaction, capturing students’ and instructors’ concerns of AI systems through Speed Dating, and suggesting practical implications for maximizing the positive impact of AI systems while minimizing the negative ones.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Anderson JR(1985)Intelligent tutoring systems Science 228 456-462
  • [2] Boyle CF(2016)Stupid tutoring systems, intelligent humans International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 26 600-614
  • [3] Reiser BJ(2015)Interaction matters: Strategies to promote engaged learning in an online introductory nutrition course Journal of Online Learning and Teaching/MERLOT 11 249-101
  • [4] Baker RS(2006)Using thematic analysis in psychology Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 77-313
  • [5] Banna J(2016)Can we open the black box of AI? Nature News 538 20-30
  • [6] Lin MFG(2016)There is a blind spot in AI research Nature 538 311-54
  • [7] Stewart M(2019)Ethical challenges for learning analytics Journal of Learning Analytics 6 25-1147
  • [8] Fialkowski MK(2019)AI and education: The importance of teacher and student relations AI & Society 34 47-301
  • [9] Braun V(2020)Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 1 1131-298
  • [10] Clarke V(2016)Effect of a blended learning environment on student critical thinking and knowledge transformation Interactive Learning Environments 24 292-3