Conditions for Facilitation by Voluntary Organizations to Enhance Social Cohesion in China

被引:0
作者
Chau-kiu Cheung
T. Wing Lo
Suk-ching Liu
机构
[1] City University of Hong Kong,Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2020年 / 148卷
关键词
Social cohesion; Organizational facilitation; Reinforcement; Empowerment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Clarifying conditions for advancing volunteers’ cohesion toward society (i.e., social cohesion), which means attachment to and benefiting society, is relevant to the mission of voluntary organizations. Such clarification is necessary in face of contradictory views between the reinforcement and empowerment models. Specifically, the reinforcement model envisions that organizational facilitation contributes more to a volunteer’s social cohesion when the volunteer’s prior social cohesion is higher. Organizational facilitation hereby includes support and training provided by the voluntary organization. By contrast, the empowerment model anticipates that organizational facilitation contributes more to a volunteer’s social cohesion when the volunteer’s prior social cohesion is lower. To clarify the conditions, a two-wave survey in China collected panel data from 456 volunteers for analysis. Results show significant positive main and interaction effects due to organizational facilitation on the volunteer’s social cohesion. Essentially, the interaction effect indicated that the volunteer’s prior social cohesion enhanced the contribution of organizational facilitation to social cohesion. Results therefore support the reinforcement model rather than the empowerment model. This implies the usefulness of the reinforcement model to inform organizational facilitation to raise volunteers’ social cohesion and other performances compatible with organizational goals.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 187
页数:14
相关论文
共 144 条
  • [1] Ai AL(2013)Character strengths and deep correlations following hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Spiritual and secular pathways to resistance among volunteers Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52 537-556
  • [2] Lemieux C(2018)Work characteristics, motivational orientations, psychological work ability and job mobility intentions of older workers PLoS ONE 13 e0195973-1040
  • [3] Richardson R(2015)Addressing limits to mainstream economic analysis of voluntary and nonprofit organizations Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly 44 1026-154
  • [4] Tice TN(2015)From flexibility human resource management to employee engagement and perceived job performance across the lifespan: A multisample study Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology 88 126-201
  • [5] Plummer C(2016)Integrating organizational-cultural values with performance management Journal of Organizational Behavior Management 36 185-112
  • [6] Huang B(1993)Work adjustment theory: A critique and suggestions for future research and application Journal of Vocational Behavior 43 105-82
  • [7] Ellison CG(2006)Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses Political Analysis 14 63-581
  • [8] Alcover C-M(2009)It ain’t natural Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly 38 564-309
  • [9] Topa G(2014)Models of volunteer management: Professional volunteer program management in social work Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance 38 297-178
  • [10] Aligica PD(2007)Is the magic still there? The use of the Hackman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology Journal of Quantitative Criminology 23 151-S265