Computed tomography for preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty: what radiologists need to know

被引:0
作者
Alexander Huppertz
Sebastian Radmer
Moritz Wagner
Torsten Roessler
Bernd Hamm
Martin Sparmann
机构
[1] Charité—University Hospitals Berlin,Department of Radiology
[2] Imaging Science Institute Charité,Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery
[3] Proendo,undefined
[4] Orthopedic Surgery,undefined
[5] Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann,undefined
[6] Charité—University Hospital,undefined
来源
Skeletal Radiology | 2014年 / 43卷
关键词
Computed tomography; Total hip arthroplasty; 3D post-processing; Radiation exposure; Hip measurements; Modular endoprosthesis; Minimally invasive surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The number of total hip arthroplasties is continuously rising. Although less invasive surgical techniques, sophisticated component design, and intraoperative navigation techniques have been introduced, the rate of peri- and postoperative complications, including dislocations, fractures, nerve palsies, and infections, is still a major clinical problem. Better patient outcome, faster recovery and rehabilitation, and shorter operation times therefore remain to be accomplished. A promising strategy is to use minimally invasive techniques in conjunction with modular implants, aimed at independently reconstructing femoral offset and leg length on the basis of highly accurate preoperative planning. Plain radiographs have clear limitations for the correct estimation of hip joint geometry and bone quality. Three-dimensional assessment based on computed tomography (CT) allows optimizing the choice and positions of implants and anticipating difficulties to be encountered during surgery. Postoperative CT is used to monitor operative translation and plays a role in arthroplastic quality management. Radiologists should be familiar with the needs of orthopedic surgeons in terms of CT acquisition, post-processing, and data transfer. The CT protocol should be optimized to enhance image quality and reduce radiation exposure. When dedicated orthopedic CT protocols and state-of-the-art scanner hardware are used, radiation exposure can be decreased to a level just marginally higher than that of conventional preoperative radiography. Surgeons and radiologists should use similar terminology to avoid misunderstanding and inaccuracies in the transfer of preoperative planning.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1051
页数:10
相关论文
共 229 条
  • [1] Malik A(2007)The science of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 463 74-84
  • [2] Dorr LD(2006)In the absence of evidence–why bother? A literature review of minimally invasive total hip replacement surgery Instr Course Lect 55 189-193
  • [3] Woolson ST(2010)Factors that predict short-term complication rates after total hip arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 2363-2371
  • [4] Soohoo NF(2011)Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 200-208
  • [5] Farng E(2007)Three-dimensional custom-designed cementless femoral stem for osteoarthritis secondary to congenital dislocation of the hip J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89 1586-1591
  • [6] Lieberman JR(2009)Accuracy of reconstruction of the hip using computerised three-dimensional pre-operative planning and a cementless modular neck J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 91 333-340
  • [7] Chambers L(2013)Standard transgluteal versus minimal invasive anterior approach in hip arthroplasty: a prospective, consecutive cohort study Orthop Rev (Pavia) 5 e31-100
  • [8] Zingmond DS(2007)Psychologic reasons for patients preferring minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 458 94-8
  • [9] Goosen JH(2006)Total hip arthroplasty: is small incision better? J Arthroplasty 21 484-144
  • [10] Kollen BJ(2005)Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study J Arthroplasty 20 139-545