Regional industrial path development: The role of new entrepreneurial firms

被引:0
作者
Rypestøl J.O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Working Life and Innovation, University of Agder, Jon Lilletunsvei 3, Grimstad
关键词
Entrepreneurship; Growth intentions; Innovation novelty; Path dependency; Regional development; Typology;
D O I
10.1186/s13731-017-0064-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Entrepreneurs play an important role in the evolutionary process of regional industries. As founders of new firms, entrepreneurs increase the supply side of the industrial economy, and by doing so, they challenge the incumbent firms to respond. From the perspective of evolutionary economics, understanding these dynamics of entrepreneurial triggers and industrial firm responds are important, as it sheds new light to our understanding of how regional industries evolve. The entrepreneurship literature offers several classifications which are helpful in distinguishing between different types of entrepreneurs and firms. However, none of these classifications and typologies are suitable for explaining what effect new entrepreneurial firms may be expected to have on regional industries and their future development. This paper seeks to address this knowledge gap. Based on two dimensions, innovation novelty and entrepreneurial growth intention, the conceptual framework develops a typology of new entrepreneurial firms’ expected effect on future regional industrial development. In doing so, the paper contributes to the field of evolutionary economic geography by introducing a new perspective on entrepreneurial firms’ contribution to dynamic regional industrial path development. © 2017, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Acs Z.J., Desai S., Hessels J., Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions, Small Business Economics, 31, 3, pp. 219-234, (2008)
  • [2] Ajzen I., The theory of planned behavior, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50, 2, pp. 179-211, (1991)
  • [3] Aldrich H.E., Cliff J.E., The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective, Journal of business venturing, 18, 5, pp. 573-596, (2003)
  • [4] Aldrich H.E., Fiol C.M., Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation, Academy of management review, 19, 4, pp. 645-670, (1994)
  • [5] Alsos G.A., Carter S., Ljunggren E., Kinship and business: how entrepreneurial households facilitate business growth, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26, 1-2, pp. 97-122, (2014)
  • [6] Arthur W.B., Self-reinforcing mechanisms in economics, The economy as an evolving complex system, 5, pp. 9-31, (1988)
  • [7] Asheim B., Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems, Innovation, 20, 3, pp. 223-241, (2007)
  • [8] Asheim B.T., Coenen L., Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters, Research policy, 34, 8, pp. 1173-1190, (2005)
  • [9] Asheim B.T., Isaksen A., Regional innovation systems: the integration of local ‘sticky’and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 1, pp. 77-86, (2002)
  • [10] Baumol W.J., Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive, The Journal of Political Economy, 98, 5, pp. 893-921, (1990)