Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after sinus conversion of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter

被引:0
作者
Juwon Kim
Sung Ho Lee
Hye Ree Kim
Tae-Wan Chung
Ji-Hoon Choi
Ju Youn Kim
Seung-Jung Park
Young Keun On
June Soo Kim
Kyoung-Min Park
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine,Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center
[2] Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine,Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
来源
Scientific Reports | / 12卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is unclear which factors are associated with progressive sinus node dysfunction after cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL) ablation. We sought to evaluate the incidence and predictors for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after CTI-dependent AFL ablation. Between January 2011 and June 2021, 353 patients underwent CTI-dependent AFL ablation were studied. During a median follow-up of 31.6 months, 30 patients (8.5%) received PPM implantation, 24 for sick sinus syndrome and 6 for atrioventricular block. In multivariable model, prior atrial fibrillation (AF) (HR 3.570; 95% CI 1.034–12.325; P = 0.044), lowest previous sinus heart rate (HR 0.942; 95% CI 0.898–0.988; P = 0.015), and left atrial volume index (LAVI) (HR 1.067; 95% CI 1.024–1.112; P = 0.002) were independently associated with PPM implantation after CTI-dependent AFL ablation. The best cut-off points for predicting PPM implantation were 60.1 ml/m2 for LAVI and 46 beats per minute for lowest previous sinus heart rate. Among the patients discharged without PPM implantation after ablation, sinus pause over three seconds at AFL termination during ablation was an independent predictor of PPM implantation (HR 17.841; 95% CI 4.626–68.807; P < 0.001). Physicians should be aware of the possibility of PPM implantation during follow-up after AFL ablation, especially in patients with the relevant risk factors.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Ferrer MI(1968)The sick sinus syndrome in atrial disease JAMA 206 645-646
[2]  
Lamas GA(2000)The mode selection trial (MOST) in sinus node dysfunction: Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of the first 1000 patients Am. Heart J. 140 541-551
[3]  
Yang PS(2021)Risk of sick sinus syndrome in patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation: A population-based cohort J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 32 2704-2714
[4]  
Lee JM(2013)Sinus node dysfunction and atrial fibrillation: Two sides of the same coin? Europace 15 161-162
[5]  
Kalman JM(2000)Electrical remodeling of the atria associated with paroxysmal and chronic atrial flutter Circulation 102 1807-1813
[6]  
Sparks PB(2012)Electroanatomic remodeling of the left atrium in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation patients without structural heart disease J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 23 232-238
[7]  
Jayaprakash S(2012)Right atrial remodeling is more advanced in patients with atrial flutter than with atrial fibrillation J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 23 1067-1072
[8]  
Vohra JK(2004)Electrophysiological and electroanatomic characterization of the atria in sinus node disease: Evidence of diffuse atrial remodeling Circulation 109 1514-1522
[9]  
Kalman JM(2013)Sinus node dysfunction in atrial fibrillation patients: The evidence of regional atrial substrate remodelling Europace 15 205-211
[10]  
Teh AW(2009)Funny current downregulation and sinus node dysfunction associated with atrial tachyarrhythmia: A molecular basis for tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome Circulation 119 1576-1585