An Appraisal on the Interpolation Methods Used for Predicting Spatial Variability of Field Hydraulic Conductivity

被引:0
作者
Biplab Ghosh
Sreeja Pekkat
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati,Department of Civil Engineering
来源
Water Resources Management | 2019年 / 33卷
关键词
Comparison; Hydraulic conductivity; Infiltration; Prediction; Spatial interpolation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Knowledge of spatial variability of soil hydraulic conductivity is a key parameter for hydrological modeling. Spatial variability of soil hydraulic conductivity, Ks is attributed to soil heterogeneities associated with texture/structure, different initial conditions, meteorological changes, and clogging. The spatial variability is quantified by employing interpolation methods to point measurements performed in the field. There are not many studies reported in the literature that deals with the critical evaluation of the relative performance of different interpolation methods for predicting spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity. The primary objective of this study is to perform a critical evaluation of five interpolation methods, namely Kriging, Inverse Distance Weighted, Natural Neighbor, Spline and Trend for the spatial prediction of hydraulic conductivity. The accuracy of different methods was assessed by comparing the predicted values with the measured hydraulic conductivity of selected locations. It was noted that the Kriging method with exponential model gave a better spatial prediction as compared to other methods. The spatial variability of Ks was found to be in the same pattern as that of the percentage variation of the sand fraction for both the sites investigated in this study. It was further noted that the prediction of Ks was found to be more precise for those stations with a higher percentage of sand. A sudden transition of soil type from sand to silt was found to influence the accuracy of spatial prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:2175 / 2190
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity at the hillslope scale: Understanding the role of land management and erosional effect [J].
Papanicolaou, Athanasios N. ;
Elhakeem, Mohamed ;
Wilson, Christopher G. ;
Burras, C. Lee ;
West, Larry T. ;
Lin, Hangsheng ;
Clark, Ben ;
Oneal, Brad E. .
GEODERMA, 2015, 243 :58-68
[32]   SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF LEACHATE TABLES, LEACHATE COMPOSITION AND HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY IN A LANDFILL STABILIZED BY IN-SITU AERATION [J].
Gebert, Julia ;
de Jong, Ties ;
Meza, Nathali ;
Rees-White, Tristan ;
Beaven, Richard Paul ;
Lammen, Hans .
DETRITUS, 2022, 19 :114-120
[33]   Spatial and temporal variations in streambed hydraulic conductivity quantified with time-series thermal methods [J].
Hatch, Christine E. ;
Fisher, Andrew T. ;
Ruehl, Chris R. ;
Stemler, Greg .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2010, 389 (3-4) :276-288
[34]   Prediction accuracy of selected spatial interpolation methods for soil texture at farm field scale [J].
Gozdowski, D. ;
Stepien, M. ;
Samborski, S. ;
Dobers, E. S. ;
Szatylowicz, J. ;
Chormanski, J. .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2015, 15 (03) :639-650
[35]   Spatial variability of soil organic matter content in Eastern Croatia assessed using different interpolation methods [J].
Durdevic, Boris ;
Jug, Irena ;
Jug, Danijel ;
Bogunovic, Igor ;
Vukadinovic, Vesna ;
Stipesevic, Bojan ;
Brozovic, Bojana .
INTERNATIONAL AGROPHYSICS, 2019, 33 (01) :31-39
[36]   Geostatistical analysis and conditional simulation for estimating the spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity in the Choushui River alluvial fan, Taiwan [J].
Jang, CS ;
Liu, CW .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2004, 18 (07) :1333-1350
[37]   Spatial and temporal variability of soil hydraulic conductivity in relation to soil water distribution, using an exponential model. [J].
Falleiros, MC ;
Portezan, O ;
Oliveira, JCM ;
Bacchi, OOS ;
Reichardt, K .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1998, 45 (3-4) :279-285
[38]   Identifying Covariates to Assess the Spatial Variability of Saturated Soil Hydraulic Conductivity Using Robust Cokriging at the Watershed Scale [J].
Soares, Mauricio Fornalski ;
Centeno, Luana Nunes ;
Timm, Luis Carlos ;
Mello, Carlos Rogerio ;
Kaiser, Douglas Rodrigo ;
Beskow, Samuel .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2020, 20 (03) :1491-1502
[39]   Coupled THM processes modeling and stochastic simulation considering spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity in underground storage caverns [J].
Zhang, Chengyuan ;
Liu, Xiaoyan ;
Liu, Quansheng .
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS IN NANO AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, PTS 1 AND 2, 2006, 326-328 :561-+
[40]   Comparison of Field and Laboratory Methods for Measuring Hydraulic Conductivity in the Unsaturated Zone in Engineered and Native Soils [J].
Garza, Pablo R. ;
Zukowski, Zachary ;
Welker, Andrea ;
LaBrake, Derron ;
Nalbandia, Richard .
GEOTECHNICAL FRONTIERS 2017: GEOTECHNICAL MATERIALS, MODELING, AND TESTING, 2017, (280) :709-718