An Appraisal on the Interpolation Methods Used for Predicting Spatial Variability of Field Hydraulic Conductivity

被引:0
作者
Biplab Ghosh
Sreeja Pekkat
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati,Department of Civil Engineering
来源
Water Resources Management | 2019年 / 33卷
关键词
Comparison; Hydraulic conductivity; Infiltration; Prediction; Spatial interpolation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Knowledge of spatial variability of soil hydraulic conductivity is a key parameter for hydrological modeling. Spatial variability of soil hydraulic conductivity, Ks is attributed to soil heterogeneities associated with texture/structure, different initial conditions, meteorological changes, and clogging. The spatial variability is quantified by employing interpolation methods to point measurements performed in the field. There are not many studies reported in the literature that deals with the critical evaluation of the relative performance of different interpolation methods for predicting spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity. The primary objective of this study is to perform a critical evaluation of five interpolation methods, namely Kriging, Inverse Distance Weighted, Natural Neighbor, Spline and Trend for the spatial prediction of hydraulic conductivity. The accuracy of different methods was assessed by comparing the predicted values with the measured hydraulic conductivity of selected locations. It was noted that the Kriging method with exponential model gave a better spatial prediction as compared to other methods. The spatial variability of Ks was found to be in the same pattern as that of the percentage variation of the sand fraction for both the sites investigated in this study. It was further noted that the prediction of Ks was found to be more precise for those stations with a higher percentage of sand. A sudden transition of soil type from sand to silt was found to influence the accuracy of spatial prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:2175 / 2190
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing field-scale variability of soil hydraulic conductivity at and near saturation
    Zhang, Xi
    Wendroth, Ole
    Matocha, Christopher
    Zhu, Junfeng
    Reyes, Javier
    CATENA, 2020, 187
  • [22] SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY AND SODIUM CONTENT OF DESERT SOILS: IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT OF IRRIGATION USING TREATED WASTEWATER
    Adhikari, P.
    Shukla, M. K.
    Mexal, J. G.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2012, 55 (05) : 1711 - 1721
  • [23] Spatial variability of the vertical saturated hydraulic conductivity of sediments around typical thermokarst lakes
    Ke, Xianmin
    Liu, Peng
    Wang, Wei
    Li, Jinlong
    Niu, Fujun
    Gao, Zeyong
    Kong, Detao
    GEODERMA, 2023, 429
  • [24] Field evaluation of methods for determining hydraulic conductivity from grain size data
    Vienken, Thomas
    Dietrich, Peter
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2011, 400 (1-2) : 58 - 71
  • [25] Spatial and temporal variability of streambed hydraulic conductivity in West Bear Creek, North Carolina, USA
    Genereux, David P.
    Leahy, Scott
    Mitasova, Helena
    Kennedy, Casey D.
    Corbett, D. Reide
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2008, 358 (3-4) : 332 - 353
  • [26] Spatial characterization of hydraulic conductivity in alluvial gravel-and-sand aquifers: a comparison of methods
    Diem, Samuel
    Vogt, Tobias
    Hoehn, Eduard
    GRUNDWASSER, 2010, 15 (04) : 241 - 251
  • [27] Spatial characterization of hydraulic conductivity in alluvial gravel-and-sand aquifers: a comparison of methods
    Diem, S.
    Vogt, T.
    Hoehn, E.
    GQ10: GROUNDWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN A RAPIDLY CHANGING WORLD, 2011, 342 : 414 - 418
  • [28] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL INTERPOLATION METHODS OF DIFFERENT FIELD MEASUREMENTS FOR COGNITIVE RADIO
    Reddy, K. Bhaskar
    Ramana, P. Venkata
    Sumiya, K.
    2017 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT TRENDS IN ELECTRONICS, INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (RTEICT), 2017, : 2212 - 2216
  • [29] Probabilistic Slope Seepage Analysis under Rainfall Considering Spatial Variability of Hydraulic Conductivity and Method Comparison
    Zou, Hao
    Cai, Jing-Sen
    Yan, E-Chuan
    Tang, Rui-Xuan
    Jia, Lin
    Song, Kun
    WATER, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [30] Geostatistical analysis and hydrofacies simulation for estimating the spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity in the Jianghan Plain, central China
    Xue, Peipei
    Wen, Zhang
    Park, Eungyu
    Jakada, Hamza
    Zhao, Dejun
    Liang, Xing
    HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 30 (04) : 1135 - 1155