Do the number of basis images and metal artifact reduction affect the production of artifacts near and far from zirconium dental implants in CBCT?

[1] Jacobs R(2018)Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use BMC Oral Health 18 88-5849

[2] Salmon B(2016)Metal artifact reduction in CT: where are we after four decades? IEEE Access 4 5826-461

[3] Codari M(2017)Evaluation of a metal artefact reduction tool on different positions of a metal object in the FOV Dentomaxillofac Radiol 46 20160366-7

[4] Hassan B(2018)Influence of acquisition parameters on the magnitude of cone beam computed tomography artifacts Dentomaxillofac Radiol 47 20180151-734

[5] Bornstein MM(2018)Current and novel techniques for metal artifact reduction at CT: practical guide for radiologists Radiographics 38 450-254

[6] Gjesteby L(2019)Difference in the artefacts production and the performance of the metal artefact reduction (MAR) tool between the buccal and lingual cortical plates adjacent to zirconium dental implant Dentomaxillofac Radiol 48 20190058-1073

[7] De Man B(2018)Magnitude of cone beam CT image artifacts related to zirconium and titanium implants: impact on image quality Dentomaxillofac Radiol 47 20180021-512

[8] Jin Y(2019)Effect of exposure parameters of cone beam computed tomography on metal artifact reduction around the dental implants in various bone densities BMC Med Imaging 19 34-214

[9] Paganetti H(2020)Magnitude of beam-hardening artifacts produced by gutta-percha and metal posts on cone-beam computed tomography with varying tube current Imaging Sci Dent 50 1-665

[10] Verburg J(2017)Evaluation of the efficacy of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in different cone beam computed tomography scanning parameters Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 123 729-44

[1] Jacobs R(2018)Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use BMC Oral Health 18 88-5849

[2] Salmon B(2016)Metal artifact reduction in CT: where are we after four decades? IEEE Access 4 5826-461

[3] Codari M(2017)Evaluation of a metal artefact reduction tool on different positions of a metal object in the FOV Dentomaxillofac Radiol 46 20160366-7

[4] Hassan B(2018)Influence of acquisition parameters on the magnitude of cone beam computed tomography artifacts Dentomaxillofac Radiol 47 20180151-734

[5] Bornstein MM(2018)Current and novel techniques for metal artifact reduction at CT: practical guide for radiologists Radiographics 38 450-254

[6] Gjesteby L(2019)Difference in the artefacts production and the performance of the metal artefact reduction (MAR) tool between the buccal and lingual cortical plates adjacent to zirconium dental implant Dentomaxillofac Radiol 48 20190058-1073

[7] De Man B(2018)Magnitude of cone beam CT image artifacts related to zirconium and titanium implants: impact on image quality Dentomaxillofac Radiol 47 20180021-512

[8] Jin Y(2019)Effect of exposure parameters of cone beam computed tomography on metal artifact reduction around the dental implants in various bone densities BMC Med Imaging 19 34-214

[9] Paganetti H(2020)Magnitude of beam-hardening artifacts produced by gutta-percha and metal posts on cone-beam computed tomography with varying tube current Imaging Sci Dent 50 1-665

[10] Verburg J(2017)Evaluation of the efficacy of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in different cone beam computed tomography scanning parameters Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 123 729-44