Sensory adaptation and inhibition of return: dissociating multiple inhibitory cueing effects

被引:0
作者
Alfred Lim
Vivian Eng
Steve M. J. Janssen
Jason Satel
机构
[1] University of Nottingham–Malaysia Campus,School of Psychology, Faculty of Science
[2] University of Tasmania,Division of Psychology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2018年 / 236卷
关键词
Attention; Inhibition of return; Saccadic responses; Dynamic neural field; Sensory adaptation; Direct inhibition;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to an increase in reaction times to targets that appeared at a previously cued location relative to an uncued location, often investigated using a spatial cueing paradigm. Despite numerous studies that have examined many aspects of IOR, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying IOR are still in dispute. The objective of the current research is to investigate the plausible mechanisms by manipulating the cue and target types between central and peripheral stimuli in a traditional cue–target paradigm with saccadic responses to targets. In peripheral-cueing conditions, we observed inhibitory cueing effects across all cue–target onset asynchronies (CTOAs) with peripheral targets, but IOR was smaller and arose later with central targets. No inhibition was observed in central-cueing conditions at any CTOAs. Empirical data were simulated using a two-dimensional dynamic neural field model. Our results and simulations support previous work demonstrating that, at short CTOAs, behavioral inhibition is only observed with repeated stimulation—an effect of sensory adaptation. With longer CTOAs, IOR is observed regardless of target type when peripheral cueing is used. Our findings suggest that behaviorally exhibited inhibitory cueing effects can be attributed to multiple mechanisms, including both attenuation of visual stimulation and local inhibition in the superior colliculus.
引用
收藏
页码:1369 / 1382
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Modeling inhibition of return as short-term depression of early sensory input to the superior colliculus [J].
Satel, J. ;
Wang, Z. ;
Trappenberg, T. P. ;
Klein, R. M. .
VISION RESEARCH, 2011, 51 (09) :987-996
[42]   Examining inhibition of return with onset and offset cues in the multiple-cuing paradigm [J].
Birmingham, E ;
Pratt, J .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2005, 118 (1-2) :101-121
[43]   When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? [J].
Hilchey, Matthew D. ;
Rajsic, Jason ;
Pratt, Jay .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (06) :3013-3032
[44]   When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? [J].
Matthew D. Hilchey ;
Jason Rajsic ;
Jay Pratt .
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2020, 82 :3013-3032
[45]   Shift in the Balance between Excitation and Inhibition during Sensory Adaptation of S1 Neurons [J].
Heiss, Jaime E. ;
Katz, Yonatan ;
Ganmor, Elad ;
Lampl, Ilan .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 28 (49) :13320-13330
[46]   Revealing effects of noninformative spatial cues: An EEG study of inhibition of return [J].
Wascher, E ;
Tipper, SP .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 41 (05) :716-728
[47]   Stress and selective attention: Immediate and delayed stress effects on inhibition of return [J].
Larra, Mauro F. ;
Pramme, Lisa ;
Schaechinger, Hattrnut ;
Frings, Christian .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2016, 108 :66-72
[48]   Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: An Inhibition of Return study [J].
Chica, Ana B. ;
Lupianez, Juan .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2009, 1278 :75-85
[49]   Dissociating scopolamine-induced disrupted and persistent latent inhibition: stage-dependent effects of glycine and physostigmine [J].
Barak, Segev ;
Weiner, Ina .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 209 (02) :175-184
[50]   The Different Inhibition of Return (IOR) Effects of Emergency Managerial Experts and Novices: An Event-Related Potentials Study [J].
Cao, Rong ;
Wu, Lue ;
Wang, Shuzhen .
FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11