Sensory adaptation and inhibition of return: dissociating multiple inhibitory cueing effects

被引:0
作者
Alfred Lim
Vivian Eng
Steve M. J. Janssen
Jason Satel
机构
[1] University of Nottingham–Malaysia Campus,School of Psychology, Faculty of Science
[2] University of Tasmania,Division of Psychology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2018年 / 236卷
关键词
Attention; Inhibition of return; Saccadic responses; Dynamic neural field; Sensory adaptation; Direct inhibition;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to an increase in reaction times to targets that appeared at a previously cued location relative to an uncued location, often investigated using a spatial cueing paradigm. Despite numerous studies that have examined many aspects of IOR, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying IOR are still in dispute. The objective of the current research is to investigate the plausible mechanisms by manipulating the cue and target types between central and peripheral stimuli in a traditional cue–target paradigm with saccadic responses to targets. In peripheral-cueing conditions, we observed inhibitory cueing effects across all cue–target onset asynchronies (CTOAs) with peripheral targets, but IOR was smaller and arose later with central targets. No inhibition was observed in central-cueing conditions at any CTOAs. Empirical data were simulated using a two-dimensional dynamic neural field model. Our results and simulations support previous work demonstrating that, at short CTOAs, behavioral inhibition is only observed with repeated stimulation—an effect of sensory adaptation. With longer CTOAs, IOR is observed regardless of target type when peripheral cueing is used. Our findings suggest that behaviorally exhibited inhibitory cueing effects can be attributed to multiple mechanisms, including both attenuation of visual stimulation and local inhibition in the superior colliculus.
引用
收藏
页码:1369 / 1382
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Dissociating proportion congruent and conflict adaptation effects in a Simon-Stroop procedure [J].
Torres-Quesada, Maryem ;
Jesus Funes, Maria ;
Lupianez, Juan .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2013, 142 (02) :203-210
[32]   Effects of relevant and irrelevant color singletons on inhibition of return and attentional capture [J].
Ulrich Ansorge ;
Heinz-Werner Priess ;
Dirk Kerzel .
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2013, 75 :1687-1702
[33]   Effects of relevant and irrelevant color singletons on inhibition of return and attentional capture [J].
Ansorge, Ulrich ;
Priess, Heinz-Werner ;
Kerzel, Dirk .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2013, 75 (08) :1687-1702
[34]   Dissociable Spatial and Temporal Effects of Inhibition of Return [J].
Wang, Zhiguo ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08)
[35]   Dissociating Consciousness From Inhibitory Control: Evidence for Unconsciously Triggered Response Inhibition in the Stop-Signal Task [J].
van Gaal, Simon ;
Ridderinkhof, K. Richard ;
van den Wildenberg, Wery P. M. ;
Lamme, Victor A. F. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2009, 35 (04) :1129-1139
[36]   Multiple cueing dissociates location- and feature-based repetition effects [J].
Hu, Kesong ;
Zhan, Junya ;
Li, Bingzhao ;
He, Shuchang ;
Samuel, Arthur G. .
VISION RESEARCH, 2014, 101 :73-81
[37]   Effects of SOA and Age on the Inhibition of Return in a Localization Task [J].
Agusti, A. I. ;
Satorres, E. ;
Pitarque, A. ;
Melendez, J. C. .
CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 38 (05) :1304-1309
[38]   Unconscious cueing effects in saccadic eye movements - Facilitation and inhibition in temporal and nasal hemifield [J].
Mulckhuyse, Manon ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
VISION RESEARCH, 2010, 50 (06) :606-613
[39]   THE GAP EFFECT AND INHIBITION OI RETURN - INTERACTIVE EFFECTS ON EYE-MOVEMENT LATENCIES [J].
ABRAMS, RA ;
DOBKIN, RS .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1994, 98 (03) :483-487
[40]   Multiple Diffusion Models to Compare Saccadic and Manual Responses for Inhibition of Return [J].
MacInnes, W. Joseph .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2017, 29 (03) :804-824