Funding global emergency medicine research—from seed grants to NIH support

被引：3

作者：

Hansoti B. ^{[1
]}

Levine A. ^{[2
]}

Ganti L. ^{[3
]}

Oteng R. ^{[4
]}

DesRosiers T. ^{[5
]}

Modi P. ^{[6
]}

Brown J. ^{[7
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD

[2] Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI

[3] Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL

[4] Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48105, MI

[5] Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, 21287, MD

[6] Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA

[7] The National Institutes of Health, Office of Emergency Care Research, Bethesda, MD

来源：

International Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2016年 / 9卷 / 1期

基金：

美国国家卫生研究院;

关键词：

Emergency care; Funding; Global Emergency Medicine; Grants; International Emergency Medicine; Public Health; Research;

D O I：

10.1186/s12245-016-0121-8

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background: Funding for global health has grown significantly over the past two decades. Numerous funding opportunities for international development and research work exist; however, they can be difficult to navigate. The 2013 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference on global health and emergency care identified the need to strengthen global emergency care research funding, solidify existing funding streams, and expand funding sources. Results: This piece focuses on the various federal funding opportunities available to support emergency physicians conducting international research from seed funding to large institutional grants. In particular, we focus on the application and review processes for the Fulbright and Fogarty programs, National Institutes of Health (NIH) Career development awards, and the Medical Education Partnership Initiative (MEPI), including tips and pathways through each application process. Conclusions: Lastly, the paper provides an index that may be used as a guide in determining whether the amount of funding provided by a grant is worth the effort in applying. © 2016, The Author(s).

引用

共 15 条

[1]

Lancet, Who runs global health?, Lancet, 373, (2009)

[2]

Hansoti B., Weiner S., Martin I., Et al., Society for Academic Emergency Medicine’s Global Emergency Medicine Academy: Global Health Elective Code of Conduct, Acad Emerg Med, 20, 12, pp. 1319-1320, (2013)

[3]

Glickman S., Kit Delgado M., Hirshon J., Et al., Defining and measuring successful emergency care networks: a research agenda, Acad Emerg Med, 17, 12, pp. 1297-1305, (2010)

[4]

Razzak J.A., Kellermann A.L., Emergency medical care in developing countries: is it worthwhile?, Bull World Health Organ, 80, 11, pp. 900-905, (2002)

[5]

Cairns C., Maier R., Adeoye O., Et al., NIH roundtable on emergency trauma research, Ann Emerg Med, 56, 5, pp. 538-550, (2010)

[6]

Mitka M., NIH signals intent to boost funding of emergency care research and training, JAMA, 308, 12, pp. 1193-1194, (2012)

[7]

Doney M., Smith J., Kapur B., Funding emergency medicine development in low- and middle-income countries, Emerg Med Clin N Am, 23, pp. 45-56, (2005)

[8]

Kaiser J., Wellcome Trust to shift from projects to people, Science, 326, (2009)

[9]

Benziger C.P., Gilman R.H., The impact of the Fogarty International Clinical Scholars and Fellows program extends beyond borders, Am J Trop Med Hyg, 91, 2, pp. 211-212, (2014)

[10]

Carothers C., Heimburger D., Schlachter S., Et al., Training programs within global networks: lessons learned in the Fogarty International Clinical Research Scholars and Fellows Program, Am J Trop Med Hyg, 90, 1, pp. 173-179, (2013)

← 1 2 →