The death of the Uppsala school: Towards a discourse-based paradigm?

被引:0
作者
Lars Håkanson
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business School,Department of International Economics, Government and Business
来源
Journal of International Business Studies | 2021年 / 52卷
关键词
Uppsala model; internationalization theories and foreign market entry theories; historical method; discourse analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The key elements of the Uppsala school paradigm of the internationalization process of the firm are the historical context to which it applies and the micro-foundations that shape firm internationalization. Technological, institutional, and political developments of recent decades have fundamentally changed both the context of international business activities and the managerial practices that guide firm behavior. Consequent revisions of the model shifted its focus from ‘internationalization’ to ‘evolution’ in firms more generally, thereby undermining its relevance and paradigmatic status. This calls for a new conceptual basis and a ‘paradigm shift’ in research on the internationalization process of the firm. To promote this endeavor, this Counterpoint advocates the explicit adoption of historical perspectives, such as that of the original Uppsala studies, and methodologies, especially ‘archeological’ discourse analysis, as originally developed by Michel Foucault. Its aim is to understand the process of knowledge creation in specific societal contexts. Combined with social constructivist approaches to the sociology of knowledge, it could fruitfully be applied to the analysis of the formation and content of beliefs and practices regarding the efficacy of different internationalization strategies, as they have evolved in business firms and other relevant epistemic communities, such as those of professional experts or industries.
引用
收藏
页码:1417 / 1424
页数:7
相关论文
共 69 条
[21]  
Foss NJ(1975)The internationalization of the firm – four Swedish cases Journal of Management Studies 12 305-323
[22]  
Pedersen T(2006)Bringing history (back) into international business Journal of International Business Studies 37 453-468
[23]  
Fougère M(2011)The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse (SKAD) Human Studies 34 43-65
[24]  
Moulettes A(2014)Building professional discourse in emerging markets: Language, context and the challenge of sensemaking Journal of International Business Studies 45 583-599
[25]  
Gopinath C(2011)The evolution of the international business field: A scientometric investigation of articles published in its premier journal Scientometrics 88 17-42
[26]  
Prasad A(2006)The multinational corporation as a multilingual community: Language and organization in a global context Journal of International Business Studies 37 321-339
[27]  
Håkanson L(2011)A critical analysis of North American business leaders’ neocolonial discourse: Global fears and local consequences Organization 18 387-406
[28]  
Håkanson L(2011)Organizing time: Internationalization narratives of executive managers International Business Review 20 136-150
[29]  
Håkanson L(1986)The dominant logic: a new linkage between diversity and performance Strategic Management Journal 7 485-501
[30]  
Kappen P(1985)Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science American Political Science Review 79 293-304