The death of the Uppsala school: Towards a discourse-based paradigm?

被引:0
作者
Lars Håkanson
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business School,Department of International Economics, Government and Business
来源
Journal of International Business Studies | 2021年 / 52卷
关键词
Uppsala model; internationalization theories and foreign market entry theories; historical method; discourse analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The key elements of the Uppsala school paradigm of the internationalization process of the firm are the historical context to which it applies and the micro-foundations that shape firm internationalization. Technological, institutional, and political developments of recent decades have fundamentally changed both the context of international business activities and the managerial practices that guide firm behavior. Consequent revisions of the model shifted its focus from ‘internationalization’ to ‘evolution’ in firms more generally, thereby undermining its relevance and paradigmatic status. This calls for a new conceptual basis and a ‘paradigm shift’ in research on the internationalization process of the firm. To promote this endeavor, this Counterpoint advocates the explicit adoption of historical perspectives, such as that of the original Uppsala studies, and methodologies, especially ‘archeological’ discourse analysis, as originally developed by Michel Foucault. Its aim is to understand the process of knowledge creation in specific societal contexts. Combined with social constructivist approaches to the sociology of knowledge, it could fruitfully be applied to the analysis of the formation and content of beliefs and practices regarding the efficacy of different internationalization strategies, as they have evolved in business firms and other relevant epistemic communities, such as those of professional experts or industries.
引用
收藏
页码:1417 / 1424
页数:7
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Adler N(1992)Academic and professional communities of discourse: Generating knowledge on transnational human resource management Journal of International Business Studies 23 551-569
[2]  
Bartholomew S(2019)The interplay between HQ legitimation and subsidiary legitimacy judgments in HQ relocation: A social psychological approach Journal of International Business Studies 50 223-249
[3]  
Balogun J(2011)Selling, resistance and reconciliation: A critical discursive approach to subsidiary role evolution in MNEs Journal of International Business Studies 42 765-786
[4]  
Fahy K(2014)The multifaceted role of language in international business: Unpacking the forms, functions and features of a critical challenge to MNC theory and performance Journal of International Business Studies 45 495-507
[5]  
Vaara E(2009)Business history and international business Business History 51 307-333
[6]  
Balogun J(2016)Historical research approaches to the analysis of internationalisation Management International Review 56 879-900
[7]  
Jarzabkowski P(1974)International transmission of information and the business firm The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 412 55-63
[8]  
Vaara E(2017)Adapting the Uppsala model to a modern world: Macro-context and microfoundations Journal of International Business Research 48 1151-1164
[9]  
Brannen MY(2005)Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations Strategic Organization 3 441-455
[10]  
Piekkari R(2016)A note on the revisited Uppsala internationalization process model – The implications of business networks and entrepreneurship Journal of International Business Studies 47 1135-1144