Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from a Hen Shed in Japan

被引:0
作者
Nobuyuki Tanaka
Megumi Ohtsu
Akane Miyazaki
机构
[1] Japan Women’s University,Faculty of Science
[2] Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI),Environmental Science Research Laboratory
来源
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment | 2020年 / 14卷
关键词
Volatile organic compounds; Hen; Chemical composition; Seasonal variation; Emission rate;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To clarify the emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from hen rearing in Japan, we collected air samples from inside a hen shed for the four seasons in 2019 and analyzed 34 VOCs in the air samples by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and high performance liquid chromatography. The temperature and humidity inside and outside of the shed were monitored simultaneously during each sampling campaign. The average concentrations of VOCs in the shed ranged from 150 to 427 µg m−3, the concentrations being higher in summer and lower in winter. Acetone, dimethyl sulfide, 2-butanone, 2-pentanone, and acetic acid were dominant throughout all the seasons and these five compounds accounted for 70–89% of the total VOCs. The reactivity of each VOC with hydroxyl radical was also calculated and dimethyl sulfide was found to be the most reactive VOC, accounting for 84–94% of the total hydroxyl radical reactivity. The emission rate (ER) for the total VOCs (µg h−1 kg−1) was 602 in winter, 7,900 in spring, 46,500 in summer and 37,600 in autumn, respectively. Acetone, dimethyl sulfide, 2-butanone, 3-pentanone and acetic acid had higher ERs throughout all the seasons, and these five components accounted for 70–90% of the ERs for the total VOCs. The ERs of the VOCs increased exponentially in accord with temperature increases inside the shed, indicating that the ERs of the VOCs depended on the ambient temperature. The annual VOC emission from one hen and from the hen shed was calculated to be 405 g y−1 and 121 kg y−1, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 252
页数:16
相关论文
共 125 条
[1]  
Akdeniz N(2013)Amino acid requirements of chickens and turkeys Health risk assessment of occupational exposure to hazardous volatile organic compounds in swine gestation, farrowing and nursery barns. Environmental Sciences: Processes and Impacts 15 563-572
[2]  
Jacobson LD(1952)A comparison of three photochemical oxidant mechanisms A review. Poultry Science 31 966-981
[3]  
Hetchler BP(2006)Heat and moisture design data for broiler houses Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume II - gas phase reactions of organic species, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 6 3625-4055
[4]  
Almquist HJ(2007)undefined The SOA/VOC/NOx system: an explicit model of secondary organic aerosol formation. Atmospheric Chemistry Physics 7 5599-5610
[5]  
Atkinson R(2010)undefined Evaluation of non-methane volatile organic compound (NMVOC) emissions from dairies. Atmospheric Environment 44 786-794
[6]  
Baulch DL(1989)undefined Journal of Geophysical Research Atmosphere 94 5121-50
[7]  
Cox RA(2013)undefined Emission inventory of primary pollutants and chemical speciation in 2010 for the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Atmospheric Environment 70 39-24
[8]  
Crowley JN(2015)undefined Volatile organic compound flux from manure of cattle fed diets differing in grain processing method and co-product inclusion. Atmospheric Environment 100 20-1420
[9]  
Hampson RF(2004)undefined Emissions of volatile organic compounds originating from UK livestock agriculture. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 84 1414-17
[10]  
Hynes RG(2019)undefined Critical Review of Volatile Organic Compound Analysis in Breath and In Vitro Cell Culture for Detection of Lung Cancer. Metabolites 9 1-167