Factors limiting the potential impacts of organic agriculture on rural development in China

被引:6
作者
Asli G.K. [1 ]
Yonggong L. [1 ]
Feng B. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agricultural University, Beijing
关键词
Agribusiness; Agricultural institutions; Agricultural sustainable development; China; Regional development policy; Rural development;
D O I
10.1007/s13165-016-0162-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to analyse the factors and challenges that limit the success and competitiveness of the Chinese organic value chain. Qualitative data have been collected through a range of stakeholder interviews. The findings were assessed and grouped through sequenced verification and validation. The competitiveness of the organic value chain is analysed according to Porter’s theory of competitive advantage. The findings reveal limiting factors, which are affecting the competitiveness of the Chinese organic food value chain. These factors include the lack of knowledge and production capacity of producers, unequal benefit sharing and insufficient extension services. Consumers’ lack of awareness and low domestic demand have resulted in an immature national organic market. Efforts to regulate the sector through strict organic standards and support policies have created unequal competition. Fierce competition is creating an unpleasant business environment with reduced trust between value chain actors. Internationally, Chinese producers are often financially disadvantaged because of the need for multi-certification. Through an inclusive and comprehensive approach, this paper identifies factors limiting the competitiveness and potential impacts of organic agriculture on rural development. The findings allow other researchers and policymakers to further develop solutions and policies to address these challenges. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 352
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Allio R.J., Flaws in Porter’s competitive diamond?, Plan Rev, 18, 5, pp. 28-33, (1990)
  • [2] Barbercheck M., Kiernan N.E., Hulting A.G., Duiker S., Hyde J., Karsten H., Sanchez E., Meeting the ‘multi-‘requirements in organic agriculture research: successes, challenges and recommendations for multifunctional, multidisciplinary, participatory projects, Renewable Agric Food Syst, 27, 2, pp. 93-106, (2011)
  • [3] Cai F., Giles J., O'Keefe P., Wang D., The elderly and old age support in rural China challenges and prospects, (2012)
  • [4] Chen S., Zheng Z., Huang P., Sustainable development for bamboo industry in Anji, Zhejiang Province of China, Res J Environ Sci, 5, pp. 279-287, (2011)
  • [5] Chouichom S., Yamao M., Comparing opinions and attitudes of organic, Journal Org Syst, 5, 1, pp. 25-35, (2010)
  • [6] Rules for implementing the certification of organic products (in English), (2011)
  • [7] David N., Validation and verification in social stimulation: patterns and clarification of terminology, Epistemological aspects of computer simulation in the social sciences, pp. 117-129, (2009)
  • [8] Demurger S., Sachs J.D., Woo W.T., Bao S., Chang G., The relative contributions of location and preferential policies in China’s regional development: being in the right place and having the right incentives, China Econ Rev, 13, pp. 444-465, (2002)
  • [9] Communities E., Food traceability—factsheet, Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection, (2007)
  • [10] European Union, (2014)