Chinese overseas industrial parks in Southeast Asia: An examination of policy mobility from the perspective of embeddedness

被引:0
作者
Tao Song
Weidong Liu
Zhigao Liu
Yeerken Wuzhati
机构
[1] CAS,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resource Research
[2] The Collaborative Innovation Center of the Geographical Environment and Frontier Development in Southwest China,College of Resources and Environment
[3] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
来源
Journal of Geographical Sciences | 2018年 / 28卷
关键词
overseas industrial parks; Southeast Asia; Belt and Road Initiative; inclusive globalization; policy mobility; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The development of overseas industrial parks is a key component of the Belt and Road Initiative and an expected experimental way of promoting inclusive globalization by inventing new forms of cooperation between China and local host countries. Policy mobility, a classic theory within international political geography addressing the connection between local and global policies, has implications for overseas industrial parks development. In this paper, we argue that policies are not easily moved directly from one place to another; instead, policies are embedded due to the role of local actors in policy mobility. This article first provides an overview of seven China-Southeast Asia economic and trade cooperation zones identified by the Ministry of Commerce, and analyzes their key participants. It then discusses policy mobility by looking into the roles of revenue, land, and talent in developing these industrial parks. The paper finds that these parks face challenges, such as the complicated geographical environments of host countries, huge pressure from enterprise investment capital, the lack of overseas service platforms, and underdeveloped agglomeration economies. In the light of the current situation, policy suggestions for the future sustainable development of overseas industrial parks are put forward.
引用
收藏
页码:1288 / 1306
页数:18
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Allen J(2007)Beyond the territorial fix: Regional assemblages, politics and power Regional Studies 41 1161-1175
  • [2] Cochrane A(2000)Decentralization, globalization and China’s partial re-engagement with the global economy New Political Economy 5 205-226
  • [3] Breslin S(2012)Conferences, informational infrastructures and mobile policies: The process of getting Sweden ‘BID ready’ European Urban and Regional Studies 19 137-152
  • [4] Cook I(2003)From discipline to flexibilization? Reading Foucault in the shadow of globalization Constellations 10 160-171
  • [5] Ward K(2015)Policy mobilities in the race for talent: Competitive state strategies in international student mobility Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 40 235-248
  • [6] Fraser N(2016)Rising powers and the drivers of uneven global development Area Development and Policy 1 279-294
  • [7] Geddie K(2017)Variegated geographies of electronic waste: Policy mobility, heterogeneity and neoliberalism Area Development and Policy 2 314-331
  • [8] Hudson R(2003)“Neoliberalism?” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21 509-512
  • [9] Inverardi-Ferri C(2010)Travelling technocrats, embodied knowledges: Globalising privatisation in telecoms and water Geoforum 41 218-226
  • [10] Larner W(2009)Clustering as anti-politics machine? Situating the politics of regional economic development and Malaysia’s multimedia super corridor Regional Studies 43 463-478