Comparative evaluation of different moulting methods on productive performance, egg quality, and antibody response of leghorn hens

被引:0
作者
Amir Saeed
Shahid Mehmood
Muhammad Shahid Zahoor
Ehsaan Ullah Khan
Muhammad Usman
Syed Ghulam Mohayud Din Hashmi
Kinza Saleem
Sohail Ahmad
机构
[1] University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences,Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology
[2] University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences,Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology
[3] University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences,Department of Wildlife and Ecology, Faculty of Fisheries and Wildlife
来源
Tropical Animal Health and Production | 2023年 / 55卷
关键词
Moulting; Feed restriction; Productive performance; Egg quality; Commercial layer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of the study was to compare three moulting procedures and their effect on productive performance, egg quality, and antibody response of leghorn hens. For this, a total of 324 laying hens were distributed into three treatment groups having 12 replicates of 9 birds each according to completely randomized design. Treatments consisted of three moulting procedures based on feed and light restriction. The targeted weight at the end of moulting was 1450–1470 g. As soon as the moulting procedure is complete, the comparative analysis of post-moult productive performance (feed intake, egg production, egg weight, egg mass, feed per dozen eggs, feed per kg egg mass, livability), egg quality characteristics (egg weight, egg length and width, shape index, surface area, volume, albumen height, weight, Haugh unit score, yolk width, height, index, egg shell pore number, shell weight, thickness, breaking strength), and antibody response against Newcastle disease and avian influenza (H-9) were evaluated. Birds subjected to moulting procedure 3 (8 days fasting and gradual decrease in light) showed improvement in productive performance, egg geometry and quality traits, and antibody response against Newcastle disease virus. Birds experienced moulting procedure 1 (11 days fasting) had improved feed intake, egg production, and livability. However, birds moulted with procedure 2 (6 days fasting) revealed intermediate result in all the studied parameters. In conclusion, moulting through feed and light restriction with 8 days fasting and gradual reduction in light has potential to improve performance of leghorn hens.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 136 条
  • [1] Akbari Moghaddam Kakhki R(2018)An appraisal of moulting on post-moult egg production and egg weight distribution in white layer hens; meta-analysis British Poultry Science 59 278-285
  • [2] Mousavi Z(2005)Canonical correlation analysis for studying the relationship between egg production traits and body weight, egg weight and age at sexual maturity in layers Czech Journal of Animal Science 50 163-168
  • [3] Anderson KE(2018)Evaluation of Antibody Titer Changes Against Newcastle disease and influenza (H9N2) in the Egg Yolk During Incubation Period and its Impact on the Replication of the Viruses New Findings in Veterinary Microbiology 1 1-35
  • [4] Akbas Y(1999)Effect of induced moulting in laying hens on production and immune parameters Poultry Science 78 171-177
  • [5] Takma C(2007)Effects of alternative moulting programs and population on layer performance: Results of the thirty-fifth North Carolina layer performance and management test Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16 365-380
  • [6] Alizadeh-Arsi L(2019)Salmonella Enteritidis infection, corticosterone levels, performance and egg quality in laying hens submitted to different methods of moulting Poultry Science 98 4416-4425
  • [7] Hoshyari A(2001)Effect of age at moulting on post moulting performance Poultry Science 80 874-878
  • [8] Ameghi-Roodsary A(2003)Historical and current moulting practices in the US table egg industry Poultry Science 82 965-970
  • [9] Ghaniei A(2003)The physiology of induced moulting Poultry Science 82 971-980
  • [10] Jafari B(2005)Utilizing different ratios of alfalfa and layer ration for moult induction and performance in commercial laying hens Poultry Science 84 362-369