Measuring fiscal sustainability in the welfare state: fiscal space as fiscal sustainability

被引:0
作者
Hyejin Ko
机构
[1] Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs,
来源
International Economics and Economic Policy | 2020年 / 17卷
关键词
Sustainability; Public finance; Fiscal space; Welfare state;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study measures the fiscal capacity of welfare states to derive parameters for a sustainable welfare state. To secure fiscal soundness, it is critical to maintain affordable welfare spending by ensuring public capacity. Adapting the concept of fiscal space, defined as the difference between the current level of public debt and the debt limit implied by the country’s historical record of fiscal adjustment by Ostry et al. (2010) and Ghosh et al. (2011), this research measures and compares the fiscal sustainability of 17 welfare states. To derive this fiscal space, the debt limit of each country is set, primarily based on the estimating of fiscal reaction function and selecting interest schedule (Ghosh et al. 2011, p. F13). We use a pooled-time-series-cross-sectional model to estimate fiscal reaction function and the vector regression model to set the interest schedule. It is found that Southern European welfare states are unsustainable if they do no immediately change their fiscal policies. Countries outside of Southern Europe are generally financially sustainable. However, the UK, the US, and France have in their recent actions exacerbated their financial sustainability. For their part, the social democratic states remain financially sound, despite high levels of welfare spending. This indicates that welfare spending does not necessarily weaken fiscal soundness, which depends on the type of welfare state.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 554
页数:23
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Afonso A(2014)A longer-run perspective on fiscal sustainability Empirica. 41 821-847
[2]  
Jalles JT(2006)Is the budget deficit sustainable when fiscal policy is nonlinear?. The case of Spain J Macroecon 28 596-608
[3]  
Bajo-Rubio O(2009)Deficit sustainability and inflation in EMU: an analysis from the fiscal theory of the Price level Eur J Polit Econ 25 525-539
[4]  
Carmen D(1967)Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis American Economic Association 57 415-426
[5]  
Vicente E(2001)Time-series-cross-section data: what have we learned in the past few years? Annu Rev Polit Sci 4 271-293
[6]  
Bajo-Rubio O(1995)What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data Am Polit Sci Rev 89 634-647
[7]  
Carmen D(2011)Modeling dynamics in time-series-cross-section political economy data Annu Rev Polit Sci 14 331-352
[8]  
Vicente E(2007)Political determinants of the fiscal sustainability: evidence from six developed individual countries Working Paper presented at the AFSE Conference in Paris, September 21 2007-45
[9]  
Baumol WJ(1995)Incumbent behavior: vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition Am Econ Rev 85 25-798
[10]  
Beck N(1995)Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choice? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits Q J Econ 110 769-271