Simultaneous Recording of Motor Evoked Potentials in Hand, Wrist and Arm Muscles to Assess Corticospinal Divergence

被引:0
作者
Stacey L. DeJong
Jayden A. Bisson
Warren G. Darling
Richard K. Shields
机构
[1] University of Iowa,Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine
[2] University of Iowa,Department of Health and Human Physiology
来源
Brain Topography | 2021年 / 34卷
关键词
Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Motor evoked potential; Cortical mapping; Coactivation; Synergy; Muscle coupling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to further develop methods to assess corticospinal divergence and muscle coupling using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Ten healthy right-handed adults participated (7 females, age 34.0 ± 12.9 years). Monophasic single pulses were delivered to 14 sites over the right primary motor cortex at 40, 60, 80 and 100% of maximum stimulator output (MSO), using MRI-based neuronavigation. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded simultaneously from 9 muscles of the contralateral hand, wrist and arm. For each intensity, corticospinal divergence was quantified by the average number of muscles that responded to TMS per cortical site, coactivation across muscle pairs as reflected by overlap of cortical representations, and correlation of MEP amplitudes across muscle pairs. TMS to each muscle’s most responsive site elicited submaximal MEPs in most other muscles. The number of responsive muscles per cortical site and the extent of coactivation increased with increasing intensity (ANOVA, p < 0.001). In contrast, correlations of MEP amplitudes did not differ across the 60, 80 and 100% MSO intensities (ANOVA, p = 0.34), but did differ across muscle pairs (ANOVA, p < 0.001). Post hoc analysis identified 4 sets of muscle pairs (Tukey homogenous subsets, p < 0.05). Correlations were highest for pairs involving two hand muscles and lowest for pairs that included an upper arm muscle. Correlation of MEP amplitudes may quantify varying levels of muscle coupling. In future studies, this approach may be a biomarker to reveal altered coupling induced by neural injury, neural repair and/or motor learning.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 429
页数:14
相关论文
共 185 条
[41]  
Devanne H(1993)How somatotopic is the motor cortex hand area? Science 261 489-1867
[42]  
Cassim F(2001)Quantitative evidence for multiple widespread representations of individual muscles in the cat motor cortex Neurosci Lett 310 183-266
[43]  
Ethier C(1981)Divergent projection of individual corticospinal axons to motoneurons of multiple muscles in the monkey Neurosci Lett 23 7-207
[44]  
Brizzi L(1998)Magnetic stimulation mapping of motor cortex: factors contributing to map area Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 109 79-66
[45]  
Thevenon A(2004)Motor outcome after subcortical stroke correlates with the degree of cortical reorganization Clin Neurophysiol 115 2144-254
[46]  
Capaday C(2010)Subject-specific muscle synergies in human balance control are consistent across different biomechanical contexts J Neurophysiol 103 3084-8
[47]  
Dewald JP(2000)Motor recovery following stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study Clin Neurophysiol 111 1860-144
[48]  
Pope PS(2005)Motor cortex plasticity induced by extensive training revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation in human Eur J Neurosci 21 259-157
[49]  
Given JD(2012)Abnormal acute changes in upper limb muscle cortical representation areas in the patients with writer's cramp during co-activation of distal and proximal muscles Acta Physiol (Oxf) 206 195-undefined
[50]  
Buchanan TS(2016)The TMS map scales with increased stimulation intensity and muscle activation Brain Topogr 29 56-undefined