Simultaneous Recording of Motor Evoked Potentials in Hand, Wrist and Arm Muscles to Assess Corticospinal Divergence

被引:0
作者
Stacey L. DeJong
Jayden A. Bisson
Warren G. Darling
Richard K. Shields
机构
[1] University of Iowa,Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine
[2] University of Iowa,Department of Health and Human Physiology
来源
Brain Topography | 2021年 / 34卷
关键词
Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Motor evoked potential; Cortical mapping; Coactivation; Synergy; Muscle coupling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to further develop methods to assess corticospinal divergence and muscle coupling using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Ten healthy right-handed adults participated (7 females, age 34.0 ± 12.9 years). Monophasic single pulses were delivered to 14 sites over the right primary motor cortex at 40, 60, 80 and 100% of maximum stimulator output (MSO), using MRI-based neuronavigation. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded simultaneously from 9 muscles of the contralateral hand, wrist and arm. For each intensity, corticospinal divergence was quantified by the average number of muscles that responded to TMS per cortical site, coactivation across muscle pairs as reflected by overlap of cortical representations, and correlation of MEP amplitudes across muscle pairs. TMS to each muscle’s most responsive site elicited submaximal MEPs in most other muscles. The number of responsive muscles per cortical site and the extent of coactivation increased with increasing intensity (ANOVA, p < 0.001). In contrast, correlations of MEP amplitudes did not differ across the 60, 80 and 100% MSO intensities (ANOVA, p = 0.34), but did differ across muscle pairs (ANOVA, p < 0.001). Post hoc analysis identified 4 sets of muscle pairs (Tukey homogenous subsets, p < 0.05). Correlations were highest for pairs involving two hand muscles and lowest for pairs that included an upper arm muscle. Correlation of MEP amplitudes may quantify varying levels of muscle coupling. In future studies, this approach may be a biomarker to reveal altered coupling induced by neural injury, neural repair and/or motor learning.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 429
页数:14
相关论文
共 185 条
[1]  
Ahdab R(2016)The hand motor hotspot is not always located in the hand knob: a Neuronavigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study Brain Topogr 29 590-597
[2]  
Ayache SS(1995)Some positive effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation Adv Neurol 67 79-106
[3]  
Brugieres P(2013)Early and late motor responses to action observation Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 8 711-719
[4]  
Farhat WH(2012)The prognostic value of motor-evoked potentials in motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke—a systematic review of the literature Funct Neurol 27 79-84
[5]  
Lefaucheur JP(2013)The neural origin of muscle synergies Front Comput Neurosci 7 51-133
[6]  
Amassian VE(2008)Combining modules for movement Brain Res Rev 57 125-91
[7]  
Cracco RQ(2016)Characteristics of corticospinal projections to the intrinsic hand muscles in skilled harpists Neurosci Lett 612 87-287
[8]  
Maccabee PJ(2001)Long-term changes in motor cortical organisation after recovery from subcortical stroke Brain Res 889 278-220
[9]  
Cracco JB(2004)The integrated nature of motor cortical function Neuroscientist 10 207-4362
[10]  
Henry K(2020)Principles of intrinsic motor cortex connectivity in primates J Neurosci 40 4348-804