Preferences, actions and voting rules

被引:0
作者
Alaitz Artabe
Annick Laruelle
Federico Valenciano
机构
[1] Universidad del País Vasco,Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico II
[2] Universidad del País Vasco,BRiDGE Group, Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico I
[3] IKERBASQUE,BRiDGE Group, Departamento de Economía Aplicada IV
[4] Basque Foundation for Science,undefined
[5] Universidad del País Vasco,undefined
来源
SERIEs | 2012年 / 3卷
关键词
Voting; Abstention; Absent voter; C71; D71;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper we address several issues related to collective dichotomous decision-making by means of quaternary voting rules, i.e., when voters may choose between four actions: voting yes, voting no, abstaining and not turning up-which are aggregated by a voting rule into a dichotomous decision: acceptance or rejection of a proposal. In particular we study the links between the actions and preferences of the actors. We show that quaternary rules (unlike binary rules, where only two actions -yes or no- are possible) leave room for “manipulability” (i.e., strategic behaviour). Thus a preference profile does not in general determine an action profile. We also deal with the notions of success and decisiveness and their ex ante assessment for quaternary voting rules, and discuss the role of information and coordination in this context.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 28
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Côrte-Real P(2004)The voter who wasn’t there: referenda, representation and abstention Soc Choice Welfare 22 349-369
[2]  
Pereira PT(2010)The properties of simple vs. absolute majority rule: cases where absences and abstentions are important J Theor Politics 22 85-122
[3]  
Dougherty KL(1997)Ternary voting games Int J Game Theory 26 335-351
[4]  
Edward J(2003)Weighted voting, abstention and multiple levels of approval Soc Choice Welfare 21 399-431
[5]  
Felsenthal DS(2009)Anonymous yes–no voting with abstention and multiple levels of approval Games Econ Behav 67 428-444
[6]  
Machover M(1973)Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result Econometrica 41 587-601
[7]  
Freixas J(2005)Assessing success and secisiveness in voting situations Soc Choice Welfare 24 171-197
[8]  
Zwicker W(2006)Success versus decisiveness: conceptual discussion and case study J Theor Politics 18 185-205
[9]  
Freixas J(1975)Strategy-proofness and arrow’s conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions J Econ Theory 10 187-217
[10]  
Zwicker W(2010)Voters’ power in voting games with abstention: Influence relation and ordinal equivalence of power theories Games Econ Behav 64 335-350