Comparison of low back fusion techniques: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches

被引：168
作者：
Cole C.D. [1 ]
McCall T.D. [1 ]
Schmidt M.H. [1 ]
Dailey A.T. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84132
来源：
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | 2009年 / 2卷 / 2期
关键词：
Complications; Degenerative disc disease; Fusion; History; Low back pain; Posterior lumbar interbody fusion; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion;
D O I：
10.1007/s12178-009-9053-8
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The authors review and compare posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). A review of the literature is performed wherein the history, indications for surgery, surgical procedures with their respective biomechanical advantages, potential complications, and grafting substances are presented. Along with the technical advancements and improvements in grafting substances, the indications and use of PLIF and TLIF have increased. The rate of arthrodesis has been shown to increase given placement of bone graft along the weight-bearing axis. The fusion rate across the disc space is further enhanced with the placement of posterior pedicle screw-rod constructs and the application of an osteoinductive material. The chief advantages of the TLIF procedure compared with the PLIF procedure included a decrease in potential neurological injury, improvement in lordotic alignment given graft placement within the anterior column, and preservation of posterior column integrity through minimizing lamina, facet, and pars dissection.
引用
收藏
页码：118 / 126
页数：8
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Resnick D.K., Choudhri T.F., Dailey A.T., Et al., Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 8: Lumbar fusion for disc herniation and radiculopathy, J Neurosurg Spine, 2, pp. 673-678, (2005)
  • [2] Davis H., Increasing rates of cervical and lumbar spine surgery in the United States, 1979-1990, Spine, 19, pp. 1117-1123, (1994)
  • [3] Resnick D.K., Choudhri T.F., Dailey A.T., Et al., Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 1: Introduction and methodology, J Neurosurg Spine, 2, pp. 637-638, (2005)
  • [4] Briggs H., Milligan P., Chip fusion of the low back following exploration of the spinal canal, J Bone Joint Surg, 26, pp. 125-130, (1944)
  • [5] Jaslow I., Intracorporeal bone graft in spinal fusion after disc removal, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 82, pp. 215-222, (1946)
  • [6] Cloward R.B., The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. I. Indications, operative technique, after care, J Neurosurg, 10, pp. 154-168, (1953)
  • [7] Cloward R.B., Posterior lumbar interbody fusion updated, Clin Orthop Relat Res., 193, pp. 16-9, (1985)
  • [8] Collis J.S., Total disc replacement: A modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion, Clin Orthop Relat Res., 193, pp. 64-7, (1985)
  • [9] Fraser R.D., Interbody, posterior, and combined lumbar fusions, Spine, 20, 24 SUPPL., (1995)
  • [10] Hutter C.G., Posterior intervertebral body fusion. A 25-year study, Clin Orthop Relat Res., 179, pp. 86-96, (1983)
12345678