Comparison of velocimeter and coherent lidar measurements for building frequency assessment

被引:0
作者
Philippe Gueguen
Véronique Jolivet
Clotaire Michel
Anne-Sophie Schveitzer
机构
[1] University J. Fourier of Grenoble,ONERA, Département Optique Théorique et Appliquée
[2] The French Aerospace Lab,Applied Computings and Mechanics Lab.
[3] Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne EPFL,undefined
来源
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering | 2010年 / 8卷
关键词
Structural monitoring; Ambient vibrations; Frequency Domain Decomposition; Coherent LIDAR; Micro doppler; Vibrometry; Remote sensing; Fiber LASER; Earthquake engineering;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Over recent years there has been a growing interest in the building frequency analysis for earthquake and structural engineering fields using ambient vibrations. Simultaneously, velocity measurements with LASER remote sensing techniques have gained more interest for several applications. This paper details the comparison of the frequency analysis obtained using sensitive velocimeter sensor and coherent LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) sensor, and applied to one RC existing building. Ambient vibrations recordings were processed using the Frequency Domain Decomposition method for defining the frequencies and mode shapes of the building target, while LASER remote sensing approach used coherent LIDAR method for velocity and frequency measurement. The results of the two systems are discussed. A good agreement is observed, which let us conclude on the ability of the coherent LIDAR to assess the frequency of existing buildings for structural and earthquake engineering fields at long range and without any retroreflector on the structure.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 338
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Boutin C(2005)In situ experiments and seismic analysis of existing buildings—part II: seismic integrity threshold Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34 1531-1546
[2]  
Hans S(2001)Modal identification of output only systems using frequency domain decomposition Smart Mater Struct 10 441-445
[3]  
Ibraim E(2004)Vibration based condition monitoring: a review Struct Health Monit 3 355-377
[4]  
Roussillon P(1936)Observed vibration of buildings Bull Seism Soc Am 26 245-277
[5]  
Brincker R(1999)Performance of an erbium LASER vibration sensor SPIE Coherent LASER Radar Technol Appl 3707 491-498
[6]  
Zhang L(1993)Dynamic characteristics of five tall buildings during strong and low-amplitude motions Struct Des Tall Build 2 1-15
[7]  
Andersen P(2000)Cityshark: a user-friendly instrument dedicated to ambient noise (microtremor) recording for site and building response studies Seismol Res Lett 71 698-703
[8]  
Carden PE(2006)The observed wander of the natural frequencies in a structure Bull Seism Soc Am 96 237-257
[9]  
Fanning P(1964)Determination of the natural periods of buildings Bull Seism Soc Am 54 1743-1756
[10]  
Carder DS(2004)Uses of ambient vibrations for Boumerdes buildings dommage analysis after the 21 May 2003 earthquake Mémoires du Service Géologique de l’Algérie 12 177-191