Quantifying topological robustness of networks under sustained targeted attacks

被引:26
作者
Piraveenan M. [1 ]
Thedchanamoorthy G. [1 ]
Uddin S. [1 ]
Chung K.S.K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Centre for Complex Systems Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, NSW
关键词
Complex networks; Robustness; Social networks;
D O I
10.1007/s13278-013-0118-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we introduce a measure to analyse the structural robustness of complex networks, which is specifically applicable in scenarios of targeted, sustained attacks. The measure is based on the changing size of the largest component as the network goes through disintegration. We argue that the measure can be used to quantify and compare the effectiveness of various attack strategies. Applying this measure, we confirm the result that scale-free networks are comparatively less vulnerable to random attacks and more vulnerable to targeted attacks. Then we analyse the robustness of a range of real world networks, and show that most real world networks are least robust to attacks based on betweenness of nodes. We also show that the robustness values of some networks are more sensitive to the attack strategy as compared to others. Furthermore, robustness coefficient computed using two centrality measures may be similar, even when the computational complexities of calculating these centrality measures may be different. Given this disparity, the robustness coefficient introduced potentially plays a key role in choosing attack and defence strategies for real world networks. While the measure is applicable to all types of complex networks, we clearly demonstrate its relevance to social network analysis. © 2013, Springer-Verlag Wien.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 952
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Albert R., Barabasi A.L., Statistical mechanics of complex networks, Rev Mod Phys, 74, pp. 47-97, (2002)
[2]  
Albert R., Jeong H., Barabasi A.L., Error and attack tolerance of complex networks, Nature, 406, pp. 378-382, (2000)
[3]  
Alon U., Introduction to systems biology: design principles of biological circuits, (2007)
[4]  
Baumbach J., Coryneregnet 4.0-a reference database for corynebacterial gene regulatory networks, BMC Bioinf, (2007)
[5]  
Bonacich P., Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations, Soc Netw, 23, 3, pp. 191-201, (2001)
[6]  
Cazabet R., Takeda H., Hamasaki M., Amblard F., Using dynamic community detection to identify trends in user-generated content, Soc Netw Anal Min, 2, 4, pp. 361-371, (2012)
[7]  
Colizza V., Flammini A., Serrano M.A., Vespignani A., Detecting rich-club ordering in complex networks, Nat Phys, 2, pp. 110-115, (2006)
[8]  
Costa L.D.F., Rodrigues F.A., Travieso G., Villas Boas P.R., Characterization of complex networks: a survey of measurements, Adv Phys, 56, 1, pp. 167-242, (2007)
[9]  
Crucittia P., Latora V., Marchiori M., Rapisarda A., Error and attack tolerance of complex networks, Phys A, 340, pp. 388-394, (2004)
[10]  
Dekker A.H., Colbert B.D., Network robustness and graph topology, Proceedings of the 27th Australasian conference on computer science. ACSC ’04, 26, pp. 359-368, (2004)