Cognitive perspectives on maintaining physicians’ medical expertise: I. Reimagining Maintenance of Certification to promote lifelong learning

被引:0
作者
Benjamin M. Rottman
Zachary A. Caddick
Timothy J. Nokes-Malach
Scott H. Fraundorf
机构
[1] University of Pittsburgh,Learning Research and Development Center
[2] University of Pittsburgh,Department of Psychology
来源
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications | / 8卷
关键词
Longitudinal assessment; Medical boards; Feedback; Continuing medical education;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Until recently, physicians in the USA who were board-certified in a specialty needed to take a summative test every 6–10 years. However, the 24 Member Boards of the American Board of Medical Specialties are in the process of switching toward much more frequent assessments, which we refer to as longitudinal assessment. The goal of longitudinal assessments is to provide formative feedback to physicians to help them learn content they do not know as well as serve an evaluation for board certification. We present five articles collectively covering the science behind this change, the likely outcomes, and some open questions. This initial article introduces the context behind this change. This article also discusses various forms of lifelong learning opportunities that can help physicians stay current, including longitudinal assessment, and the pros and cons of each.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 379 条
[1]  
Ackerman PL(1997)Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits Psychological Bulletin 121 219-245jh
[2]  
Heggestad ED(2017)Rethinking the use of tests: A meta-analysis of practice testing Review of Educational Research 87 659-701
[3]  
Adesope OO(2017)Improving self-regulated learning with a retrieval practice intervention Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 24 43-56
[4]  
Trevisan DA(2002)When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer Psychological Bulletin 128 612-637
[5]  
Sundararajan N(2009)Clinical decision support systems: State of the art AHRQ Publication 90069 1-26
[6]  
Ariel R(2008)Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine The American Journal of Medicine 121 S2-S23
[7]  
Karpicke JD(2013)Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval Memory & Cognition 41 392-402
[8]  
Barnett SM(1989)Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15 657-1052
[9]  
Ceci SJ(2019)Similarity matters: A meta-analysis of interleaved learning and its moderators Psychological Bulletin 145 1029-35
[10]  
Berner ES(2013)Prospective comparison of curbside versus formal consultations Journal of Hospital Medicine 8 31-1465