Clinicopathologic features and prognosis analysis of mucinous gastric carcinoma

被引:0
作者
Chunming Yin
Deming Li
Zhe Sun
Ting Zhang
Yan Xu
Zhenning Wang
Huimian Xu
机构
[1] The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University,Department of Anesthesiology
[2] First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University,Department of Surgical Oncology
来源
Medical Oncology | 2012年 / 29卷
关键词
Gastric carcinoma; Mucinous gastric carcinoma; Prognosis; Clinicopathologic; Stomach;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mucious gastric carcinoma (MGC) is a subtype of gastric carcinoma and its clinicopathologic features and prognosis still remain unclear. To investigate the clinical significance and surgical outcomes of mucinous gastric carcinoma, 2,769 patients with gastric carcinoma were analyzed in a case control study. We reviewed the records of 196 patients with mucinous gastric carcinoma and 2,573 with nonmucinous gastric carcinoma (NGC). Clinicopathologic features and survival rate of patients were analyzed. In all registered patients, patients with MGC had a larger size, more T3 and T4 invasion to the gastric wall, more positive lymph node metastasis, more III and IV stage and more positive peritoneal dissemination, but less curative gastrectomy. In curative gastrectomy patients, MGC had larger size, deeper invasion to gastric wall, more positive lymph node metastasis and more advanced TNM stage. The overall survival rate in curative gastrectomy patients with MGC was significantly lower than that for patients with NGC (P < 0.021). Age (P = 0.001), location of tumor (P < 0.001), Borrmann type (P = 0.037), depth of invasion (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001) and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of gastric carcinoma, but MGC itself was not. The prognosis of MGC did not have significant difference compared with NGC. Frequently, MGC was of advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. Age, location of tumor, Borrmann type, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis and lymphovascular invasion are independent prognostic factors of gastric carcinoma, but mucinous histological type itself is not. Further study on the origin and progression of MGC is needed in future.
引用
收藏
页码:864 / 870
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Ming SC(1977)Gastric carcinoma: a pathobiological classification Cancer. 39 2475-2485
[2]  
Lauren P(1965)The two histologic main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma: an attempt at a histo-clinical classification Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 64 31-49
[3]  
Hidaka S(1998)Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 2nd English edition Gastric Cancer 1 10-24
[4]  
Woo LS(2008)Clinicopathology and prognosis of mucinous gastric carcinoma Hepatogastroenterology 55 791-794
[5]  
Kim DY(2002)Clinicopathologic features of mucinous gastric carcinoma Dig Surg. 19 286-290
[6]  
Kim YJ(2001)A clinicopathologic study of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the stomach Gastric Cancer 4 83-86
[7]  
Kim SK(1966)Prognosis in carcinoma of the stomach in relation to the microscopic type Surg Gynecol Obstet. 122 485-494
[8]  
Kawamura H(2001)Clinicopathologic study of early-stage mucinous gastric carcinoma Cancer. 91 698-703
[9]  
Hoerr SO(1990)The World Health Organization’s histologic classification of gastrointestinal tumors. A commentary on the second edition Cancer 66 2162-2167
[10]  
Hazard JB(1998)A clinicopathologic study of mucinous gastric carcinoma including multivariate analysis Cancer. 83 1312-1318